首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Civil Engineering >Comparison between Strain-Based vs. Stress-Based Criteria in Seismic Performance Evaluation of High Arch Dams
【24h】

Comparison between Strain-Based vs. Stress-Based Criteria in Seismic Performance Evaluation of High Arch Dams

机译:高拱坝抗震性能评估中基于应变和基于应力的准则比较

获取原文
       

摘要

In the present paper, seismic performance of a high concrete arch dam is evaluated based on both the stress and strain criteria. For this purpose, the finite element model of the selected arch dam-reservoir-foundation system was provided. Reservoir was modeled using Eulerian approach as a compressible domain and the foundation rock was assumed to be massless. Dynamic equilibrium equations for the coupled system were solved using Newmark's time integration algorithm. Seismic performance evaluation of dam-foundation-reservoir systems were performed considering parameters such as demand-capacity ratio, cumulative inelastic duration and extension of overstressed (or overstrained) areas obtained from linear elastic analyses and compared with the real crack profile from nonlinear analysis. It was found that although results obtained for the stress and strain rules have similarities, performance evaluation based on the strain gives different results which can be lead to different decision making in dam safety related projects.
机译:在本文中,基于应力和应变准则对高混凝土拱坝的抗震性能进行了评估。为此,提供了所选拱坝-水库-基础系统的有限元模型。使用欧拉方法作为可压缩区域对储层进行了建模,并假定基础岩石是无质量的。使用Newmark的时间积分算法求解了耦合系统的动态平衡方程。坝基-水库系统的抗震性能评估是通过考虑诸如需求能力比,累积非弹性持续时间以及通过线性弹性分析获得的过应力(或超应变)区域的扩展等参数进行的,并与非线性分析的真实裂缝轮廓进行了比较。结果发现,尽管应力和应变规则获得的结果相似,但基于应变的性能评估却得出不同的结果,这可能导致大坝安全相关项目的决策不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号