首页> 外文期刊>Advances in physiology education >Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials
【24h】

Assessment outcome is weakly correlated with lecture attendance: influence of learning style and use of alternative materials

机译:评估结果与演讲出席率之间的相关性很弱:学习风格和替代材料的使用的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

The relation between lecture attendance and learning is surprisingly weak, and the role of learning styles in this is poorly understood. We hypothesized that 1) academic performance is related to lecture attendance and 2) learning style influences lecture attendance and, consequently, affects performance. We also speculated that the availability of alternative resources would affect this relationship. Second-year Bachelor of Science physiology students (n = 120) self-reported their lecture attendance in a block of 21 lectures (attendance not compulsory) and use of alternative resources. Overall self-reported lecture attendance was 73 ± 2%. Female students (n = 71) attended more lectures (16.4 ± 0.6) than male students (14.3 ± 0.08, n = 49) and achieved a higher composite mark in all assessments (73.6% vs. 69.3%, P < 0.02). Marks in the final exam were not statistically different between the sexes and correlated only weakly with lecture attendance (r = 0.29, n = 49, P < 0.04 for male students; r = 0.10, n = 71, P = not significant for female students; and r =0.21, n = 120, P < 0.02 for the whole class). Of the students who passed the exam, poor attenders (<11 lectures) reported significantly more use of lecture recordings (37 ± 8%, n = 15, vs. 10 ± 1%, n = 85, P < 0.001). In a VARK learning style assessment (where V is visual, A is auditory, R is reading/writing, and K is kinesthetic), students were multimodal, although female students had a slightly higher average percentage of the R learning style (preferred read/write) compared with male students (28.9 ± 0.9%, n = 63, vs. 25.3 ± 1.3%, n = 32, P < 0.03). Lecture attendance was not correlated with measured learning style. We concluded that lecture attendance is only weakly correlated with academic performance and is not related to learning style. The substitution of alternative materials for lecture attendance appears to have a greater role than learning style in determining academic outcomes.
机译:出勤率和学习之间的关系令人惊讶地薄弱,并且学习风格在其中的作用还知之甚少。我们假设1)学习成绩与讲课出席率有关,以及2)学习风格会影响讲课出席率,因此会影响表演。我们还推测,替代资源的可用性将影响这种关系。理学学士学位课程的二年级学生(n = 120)在21堂课中报告了自己的出勤情况(不强制参加)和使用替代资源。自我报告的总体演讲出席率为73±2%。女学生(n = 71)的上课次数(16.4±0.6)比男学生(14.3±0.08,n = 49)多,在所有评估中的综合得分均较高(73.6%对69.3%,P <0.02)。最终考试中的成绩在性别上没有统计学差异,并且与出勤率的相关性很小(男生r = 0.29,n = 49,P <0.04;男生r = 0.10,n = 71,P =对女学生无显着性;并且r = 0.21,n = 120,对于整个类别,P <0.02)。在通过考试的学生中,出席率不佳(<11堂课)的学生报告讲课录音的使用量显着增加(37±8%,n = 15,而10±1%,n = 85,P <0.001)。在VARK学习风格评估中(其中V是视觉,A是听觉,R是阅读/写作,K是运动感觉),学生是多模式的,尽管女学生的R学习风格的平均百分比略高(首选阅读/与男学生相比(28.9±0.9%,n = 63,vs. 25.3±1.3%,n = 32,P <0.03)。上课人数与测得的学习风格无关。我们得出的结论是,听课与学习成绩之间的关系很小,与学习风格无关。在确定学术成果方面,替代学习讲课的替代材料似乎比学习方式具有更大的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号