首页> 外文期刊>Creative Education >Mind Mapping and Philosophy in Junior High School: A Comparative Study of Initial Philosophical Writing in Classes of 8th Grade Pupils Used and Unused to Philosophically Directed Discussion
【24h】

Mind Mapping and Philosophy in Junior High School: A Comparative Study of Initial Philosophical Writing in Classes of 8th Grade Pupils Used and Unused to Philosophically Directed Discussion

机译:初中的思维导图和哲学:八年级学生使用和不使用哲学指导讨论的初期哲学写作的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

This study compares the written production of 8th grade junior high school pupils in two conditions. Four experimental classes used to philosophically directed discussion (PDD) in the classroom were asked, as part of a teaching program ( Philo & Carto ), to implicitly link pictorial items in selected cultural heritage artworks (Brueghel, Niki de St Phalle, Magritte, etc . ) to their ideas discussed collectively in philosophical discussions. The pupils in three control classes, with no prior experience of philosophical discussions, were shown the same artworks and asked for their impressions in art classes. We compared how philosophy entered written communication in the two conditions. By sorting the types of rough notes (outlines of ideas) produced by the pupils into seven categories using an inductive approach, we found that the PDD classes produced more conceptual and better organized rough notes than the controls , that? distanced ? themselves less from the artwork and so produced conceptually poorer notes. These findings argue for formalizing the theoretical and practical basis of the? Philo & Carto ?teaching program. Our conclusion discusses the limitations of the study and suggests some further research directions.
机译:本研究比较了两种情况下初中八年级学生的书面作品。作为教学计划( Philo&Carto)的一部分,要求在课堂上进行四个用于哲学指导讨论(PDD)的实验班,以隐含地链接选定的文化遗产艺术品中的绘画作品(Brueghel,Niki de St Phalle,马格里特(Magritte)等人在哲学讨论中集体讨论了他们的思想。以前没有进行过哲学讨论的三个控制班的学生被展示相同的艺术品,并要求他们对艺术班的印象。我们比较了在两种情况下哲学如何进入书面交流。通过使用归纳法将学生产生的粗略笔记的类型(观念的概述)分为七个类别,我们发现PDD类比对照产生的概念性更强,组织更好的粗略笔记,那?距离远?本身较少来自艺术品,因此产生了概念上较差的音符。这些发现为形式化的理论和实践基础辩解。 Philo&Carto的教学计划。我们的结论讨论了研究的局限性,并提出了一些进一步的研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号