首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Migration Studies >Definitional Debates, Mechanisms and Canada: Comment on Will Kymlicka’s article: “Solidarity in Diverse Societies”
【24h】

Definitional Debates, Mechanisms and Canada: Comment on Will Kymlicka’s article: “Solidarity in Diverse Societies”

机译:定义性辩论,机制与加拿大:评Will Kymlicka的文章:“多元化社会的团结”

获取原文
       

摘要

Does immigrant-origin diversity undermine states’ willingness to engage in broad social redistribution, from enacting “living” minimum wage laws and progressive taxation, to providing public benefits in order to mitigate economic inequality? In asking this question, Will Kymlicka (2015), one of the staunchest defenders of multiculturalism, takes seriously the question of whether recognition of cultural, ethnic and religious diversity comes at the expense of redistribution. Not surprisingly, Kymlicka makes a strong pitch for a multicultural welfare state, which he distinguishes from neoliberal multiculturalism, exclusionary welfare chauvinism or assimilatory neoliberalism1 (Kymlicka, 2015).
机译:从颁布“生活”最低工资法和累进税制到提供公共利益以减轻经济不平等,移民起源的多样性是否会破坏各州参与广泛的社会再分配的意愿?在问这个问题时,威尔·金姆利卡(Will Kymlicka,2015)是最坚决的多元文化捍卫者之一,他认真地考虑了承认文化,种族和宗教多样性是否以牺牲再分配为代价的问题。毫不奇怪,Kymlicka对多元文化福利国家提出了强烈要求,他将其与新自由主义多元文化主义,排他性福利沙文主义或同化新自由主义区别开来(Kymlicka,2015)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号