首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Migration Studies >From discourse to practice: the circulation of norms, ideas and practices of migration management through the implementation of the mobility partnerships in Moldova and Georgia
【24h】

From discourse to practice: the circulation of norms, ideas and practices of migration management through the implementation of the mobility partnerships in Moldova and Georgia

机译:从讨论到实践:通过在摩尔多瓦和格鲁吉亚实施流动性伙伴关系,传播移民管理的规范,思想和做法

获取原文
       

摘要

This research wishes to contribute to the understanding of the migration policy regime of the European Union (EU), by considering an analytical perspective that privileges the standpoint of the countries of its neighbourhood. As an entry point, we have focused our analysis on the Mobility Partnership, a policy instrument of soft power, representative of the emblematic network governance privileged by the EU in its current political framework, the Global Approach to Migration and Mobility (GAMM). Applying an “instrument approach”, our research raises the question of the role played by the Mobility Partnership in the circulation of norms, ideas and practices related to the “good governance” of international migration, and whether these are internalized by the partner third countries. We present the results of a comparative analysis of two study-cases, Moldova and Georgia, countries considered by the European Commission as the “best pupils” in the implementation of their Mobility Partnerships, with the ambition to interrogate whether this instrument leads to a “common understanding” between the EU and the national actors that may lead to a translation of the European objectives in the field of migration into the registries of practices in the countries of the Eastern neighbourhood. Lastly, we will discuss the strategic “usage” of this instrument from the partner third countries, that can lead to different results, from complete absorption of the objectives, to resistance in their implementation.
机译:这项研究希望通过考虑使邻国国家的立场享有特权的分析观点,有助于对欧洲联盟(EU)的移民政策制度的理解。作为切入点,我们将分析重点放在软实力的政策工具-流动伙伴关系上,代表欧盟在其当前政治框架中享有的象征性网络治理-全球移民与流动方法(GAMM)。应用“手段方法”,我们的研究提出了以下问题:流动伙伴关系在与国际移徙“善治”有关的规范,思想和实践的传播中所起的作用,以及这些是否被合作伙伴第三国内部化。我们提供了两个研究案例的比较分析结果,摩尔多瓦和格鲁吉亚这两个国家被欧盟委员会视为实施其流动性伙伴关系的“最佳学生”,其雄心壮志是要询问该文书是否会导致“欧盟与国家行为者之间的“共识”,这可能导致将移民领域中的欧洲目标转化为东部邻国的实践登记册。最后,我们将与合作伙伴第三国讨论该工具的战略“用途”,这可能导致不同的结果,从完全吸收目标到在执行过程中遇到阻力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号