首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications >A Phase 1, randomized, open-label crossover study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of 400 mg albaconazole administered to healthy participants as a tablet formulation versus a capsule formulation
【24h】

A Phase 1, randomized, open-label crossover study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of 400 mg albaconazole administered to healthy participants as a tablet formulation versus a capsule formulation

机译:第1期,随机,开放标签交叉研究,用于评估以片剂和胶囊剂形式对健康参与者服用400毫克阿尔巴康唑的安全性和药代动力学

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Albaconazole is a novel triazole being developed for the oral treatment of fungal diseases. Once-weekly oral dosing with 400 mg albaconazole for 24 or 36 weeks resulted in high rates of clinical and mycological resolution for distal subungual onychomycosis, as well as a favorable safety and tolerability profile.Purpose: To compare four 100-mg albaconazole capsules to one 400-mg albaconazole tablet for bioavailability, bioequivalence, tolerability, and safety.Patients and methods: Forty participants were enrolled in this Phase I, open-label, two-sequence crossover study. Twenty participants were exposed to a single 400-mg tablet dose of albaconazole before being crossed over to a single dose of four 100-mg albaconazole capsules. The second group of 20 participants received the study products in reverse order. Blood samples were taken over 15 days post-dose to assess the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of albaconazole and its primary metabolite, 6-hydroxyalbaconazole. Safety was assessed throughout the study.Results: The area under the curve (AUC) and maximum measured plasma concentration (Cmax) of the albaconazole tablet were approximately 10% and 22% lower, respectively, than for the albaconazole capsules. Statistical significance was reached for the Cmax but not for the AUC measurements (AUC0-t and AUC0-inf). Because the 90% confidence intervals based on the differences between the tablet and capsule were outside the 80%–125% range for both the Cmax and AUC, we concluded that the formulations were not bioequivalent with respect to the rate or extent of absorption. Both formulations were safe and well-tolerated in this study. All adverse events (AEs) were generally mild and were mainly gastrointestinal- or nervous system-related (eg, dizziness, headache). No electrocardiogram findings were reported as an AE, and no serious AEs or deaths were reported.Conclusion: The AUC and Cmax of albaconazole after a single 400-mg oral dose administered as a tablet formulation were lower than those of a capsule formulation. Albaconazole tablets and capsules cannot, therefore, be considered bioequivalent.
机译:背景:阿尔巴康唑是一种新型的三唑,正在开发用于口服治疗真菌病。每周一次口服400毫克阿尔巴康唑,持续24或36周,可导致远端指甲下甲癣的临床和真菌学解决率很高,并具有良好的安全性和耐受性。目的:将四个100毫克阿尔巴康唑胶囊与一个胶囊进行比较具有生物利用度,生物等效性,耐受性和安全性的400毫克阿尔巴康唑片剂。患者和方法:40名参与者参加了第一阶段,开放标签,两序列交叉研究。二十名参与者在服用四剂100毫克albaconazole胶囊之前,先接受一剂400毫克片剂的albaconazole。第二组20名参与者以相反的顺序收到了研究产品。给药后15天采集血样,以评估阿尔巴康唑及其主要代谢产物6-羟基铝康唑的血浆浓度和药代动力学参数。在整个研究过程中对安全性进行了评估。结果:阿尔巴康唑片剂的曲线下面积(AUC)和最大测得血浆浓度(Cmax)分别比阿尔巴康唑胶囊低约10%和22%。 Cmax达到了统计显着性,而AUC测量未达到统计学上的显着性(AUC0-t和AUC0-inf)。因为基于片剂和胶囊之间差异的90%置信区间在Cmax和AUC的80%–125%范围之外,所以我们得出结论,就吸收速率或吸收程度而言,制剂的生物等效性不高。在本研究中,两种配方均安全且耐受性良好。所有不良事件(AEs)一般都是轻度的,主要与胃肠道或神经系统有关(例如头晕,头痛)。没有心电图报告为AE,也没有严重的AE或死亡。结论:口服400毫克片剂制剂的阿尔巴康唑的AUC和Cmax低于胶囊制剂。因此,不能将Albaconazole片剂和胶囊剂视为具有生物等效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号