首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins and fluconazole in the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic adult patients
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins and fluconazole in the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in nonneutropenic adult patients

机译:三种棘球oc素和氟康唑治疗非中性粒细胞减少症成年患者念珠菌血症和/或侵袭性念珠菌病的成本效益

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of three echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin) and generic fluconazole in the treatment of nonneutropenic adult patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in intensive care units in Spain. Materials and methods: A decision-tree model was applied. The success and safety (hepatic and renal adverse effects) of first-line treatments were obtained from meta-analyses and systematic reviews of clinical trials. In the case of failure, a second-line treatment (liposomal amphotericin B after the echinocandins, or one of the echinocandins after fluconazole) was administered. The duration of the treatments (14 days total) was established by a panel of clinical experts using the Delphi method and according to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. The cost of the medications and renal toxicity were considered. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulations were carried out. Results: The total cost of the treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis with anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, and fluconazole was €5,483, €5,968, €6,231, and €2,088, respectively. Anidulafungin was the dominant treatment (more effective, less expensive) compared to micafungin and caspofungin. The cost of achieving one more patient successfully treated with anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin compared to fluconazole was €17,199, €23,962, and €27,339, respectively. The result remained stable, despite modification of the duration of the first-line and second-line treatments, as well as most of the dosing regimens. The probabilistic analysis also remained stable. Conclusion: In accordance with this economic study, anidulafungin would produce savings and would be the dominant treatment compared with micafungin and caspofungin in nonneutropenic adult patients with candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis in intensive care units in Spain.
机译:目的:评估三种棘球and碱(阿尼芬净,卡泊芬净和米卡芬净)和仿制药氟康唑在西班牙重症监护室治疗非中性粒细胞减少性念珠菌血症和/或侵袭性念珠菌病的成本效益。材料和方法:应用决策树模型。一线治疗的成功和安全(肝和肾的不良反应)来自荟萃分析和临床试验的系统评价。在失败的情况下,进行第二线治疗(在棘孢菌素后使用脂质体两性霉素B,或在氟康唑后使用一种棘球菌素)。治疗的持续时间(总共14天)由一组临床专家使用Delphi方法并根据美国传染病学会指南确定。考虑了药物的成本和肾毒性。使用蒙特卡洛模拟进行了确定性和概率敏感性分析。结果:阿尼芬净,卡泊芬净,米卡芬净和氟康唑治疗念珠菌血症和/或侵袭性念珠菌病的总费用分别为5,483欧元,5,968欧元,6,231欧元和2,088欧元。与米卡芬净和卡泊芬净相比,阿尼芬净为主要治疗方法(更有效,更便宜)。与氟康唑相比,使另一名成功接受阿尼芬净,卡泊芬净和米卡芬净治疗的患者的费用分别为17,199欧元,23,962欧元和27,339欧元。尽管修改了一线和二线治疗的持续时间以及大多数给药方案,结果仍保持稳定。概率分析也保持稳定。结论:根据这项经济研究,在西班牙重症监护病房的非中性粒细胞减少性念珠菌血症和/或浸润性念珠菌病成年患者中,与米卡芬净和卡泊芬净相比,阿尼芬净可节省成本,并且是主要的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号