首页> 外文期刊>Child Development Research >Children’s and Adolescents’ Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study
【24h】

Children’s and Adolescents’ Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study

机译:儿童和青少年临时句法歧义的处理:一项眼动研究

获取原文
       

摘要

This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g.,While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g.,Did the storm blow the boat?). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g.,sat). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.
机译:这项研究检查了24名儿童和青少年在阅读包含暂时句法歧义的句子时的眼球运动。先前的研究表明,儿童在做出最初的解析决策时主要使用语法信息,并且他们倾向于忽略语义和上下文信息。在每项审判中,参与者都阅读了一条花园小径的句子(例如,暴风雨把船停在棚子里时吹响了),然后,他们回答了一个理解性问题(例如,暴风雨把船吹了吗?)。设计是2×2(动词类型×模糊度)重复测量。动词类型可选地是及物性的或反身的,句子是模棱两可的。结果显示,歧义动词(例如,sat)的第一遍阅读时间没有差异。但是,回归确实显示出显着的相互作用。明确的反身条件的回归次数大约为一半,这表明在此条件下处理难度较小。从发展上看,我们发现青少年的理解力明显更好,这似乎与摆脱歧义词的趋势增加有关。研究结果与以下假设是一致的:与青少年相比,儿童的处理架构受到更多限制。此外,结果表明歧义度的差异与干扰控制有关,但与工作记忆无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号