首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study
【24h】

Physical activity on prescription (PAP) from the general practitioner’s perspective – a qualitative study

机译:从全科医生的角度看处方运动(PAP)–定性研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Physical activity on prescription (PAP) is a successful intervention for increasing physical activity among patients with a sedentary lifestyle. The method seems to be sparsely used by general practitioners (GPs) and there is limited information about GPs’ attitudes to counselling using PAP as a tool. The aim of the study was to explore and understand the meaning of prescribing physical activity from the general practitioner’s perspective. Methods Three focus group interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 15 Swedish GPs in the south of Sweden. Participants were invited to talk about their experience of using PAP. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results The analysis resulted in four categories: The tradition makes it hard to change attitude, Shared responsibility is necessary, PAP has low status and is regarded with distrust and Lack of procedures and clear guidelines. Traditionally GPs talk with patients about the importance of an increased level of physical activity but they do not prescribe physical activity as a treatment. Physician’s education focuses on the use of pharmaceuticals. The responsibility for patients’ physical activity level is shared with other health professionals, the patient and society. The GPs express reservations about prescribing physical activity. A heavy workload is a source of frustration. PAP is regarded with distrust and considered to be a task of less value and status. Using a prescription to emphasize an increased level is considered to be redundant and the GPs think it should be administered by someone else in the health care system. Scepticism about the result of the method was also expressed. Conclusions There is uncertainty about using PAP as a treatment since physicians lack education in non-pharmaceutical methods. The GPs do not regard the written referral as a prioritized task and rather refer to other professionals in the health care system to prescribe PAP. GPs pointed out a need to create routines and arrangements for the method to gain credibility and become everyday practice among GPs.
机译:背景技术处方体育锻炼(PAP)是一种成功的干预措施,可以增加久坐的生活方式的患者的体育锻炼。全科医生(GP)似乎很少使用这种方法,而且关于GP对待使用PAP作为工具进行咨询的态度的信息很少。这项研究的目的是从全科医生的角度探索并理解开处方体育活动的含义。方法以瑞典南部15个瑞典GP为目标样本,进行了3​​次焦点小组访谈。邀请参与者谈论他们使用PAP的经验。访谈逐字记录,使用定性内容分析法进行分析。结果分析结果分为四类:传统难以改变态度,共同责任是必要的,人民行动党地位低下,不信任,缺乏程序和明确的指导方针。传统上,全科医生会与患者讨论增加体育锻炼水平的重要性,但他们并未将体育锻炼列为治疗方法。医师的教育重点是药物的使用。与其他健康专业人员,患者和社会共同承担患者身体活动水平的责任。全科医生对开处方体育活动表示保留。繁重的工作量是令人沮丧的原因。 PAP被认为是不信任的,被认为是价值和地位较低的任务。使用处方强调增加的水平被认为是多余的,GP认为应由医疗保健系统中的其他人来管理。也有人对该方法的结果表示怀疑。结论由于医生缺乏非药物方法的教育,因此使用PAP进行治疗存在不确定性。全科医生不将书面转诊视为优先任务,而是请卫生保健系统中的其他专业人员开具PAP。全科医生指出,有必要为该方法创建例程和安排,以赢得信誉并成为全科医生的日常实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号