首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Genetics >Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction and penalized logistic regression for detecting gene-gene Interaction in a case-control study
【24h】

Power of multifactor dimensionality reduction and penalized logistic regression for detecting gene-gene Interaction in a case-control study

机译:病例对照研究中多维度降维和惩罚逻辑回归在检测基因-基因相互作用中的作用

获取原文
       

摘要

Background There is a growing awareness that interaction between multiple genes play an important role in the risk of common, complex multi-factorial diseases. Many common diseases are affected by certain genotype combinations (associated with some genes and their interactions). The identification and characterization of these susceptibility genes and gene-gene interaction have been limited by small sample size and large number of potential interactions between genes. Several methods have been proposed to detect gene-gene interaction in a case control study. The penalized logistic regression (PLR), a variant of logistic regression with L 2 regularization, is a parametric approach to detect gene-gene interaction. On the other hand, the Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) is a nonparametric and genetic model-free approach to detect genotype combinations associated with disease risk. Methods We compared the power of MDR and PLR for detecting two-way and three-way interactions in a case-control study through extensive simulations. We generated several interaction models with different magnitudes of interaction effect. For each model, we simulated 100 datasets, each with 200 cases and 200 controls and 20 SNPs. We considered a wide variety of models such as models with just main effects, models with only interaction effects or models with both main and interaction effects. We also compared the performance of MDR and PLR to detect gene-gene interaction associated with acute rejection(AR) in kidney transplant patients. Results In this paper, we have studied the power of MDR and PLR for detecting gene-gene interaction in a case-control study through extensive simulation. We have compared their performances for different two-way and three-way interaction models. We have studied the effect of different allele frequencies on these methods. We have also implemented their performance on a real dataset. As expected, none of these methods were consistently better for all data scenarios, but, generally MDR outperformed PLR for more complex models. The ROC analysis on the real dataset suggests that MDR outperforms PLR in detecting gene-gene interaction on the real dataset. Conclusion As one might expect, the relative success of each method is context dependent. This study demonstrates the strengths and weaknesses of the methods to detect gene-gene interaction.
机译:背景技术人们日益意识到,多个基因之间的相互作用在常见,复杂的多因素疾病的风险中起着重要的作用。许多常见疾病受某些基因型组合(与某些基因及其相互作用)的影响。这些易感基因以及基因与基因之间的相互作用的鉴定和表征受到样本量小和基因之间大量潜在相互作用的限制。在病例对照研究中,已经提出了几种检测基因-基因相互作用的方法。惩罚逻辑回归(PLR)是具有L 2 正则化的逻辑回归的变体,是一种检测基因-基因相互作用的参数方法。另一方面,多因素降维(MDR)是一种非参数且无遗传模型的方法,用于检测与疾病风险相关的基因型组合。方法我们通过广泛的模拟比较了病例对照研究中MDR和PLR检测双向和三向相互作用的功能。我们生成了几个具有不同大小的交互作用的交互模型。对于每个模型,我们模拟了100个数据集,每个数据集包含200个案例,200个对照和20个SNP。我们考虑了多种模型,例如仅具有主效应的模型,仅具有相互作用效应的模型或具有主要和相互作用效应的模型。我们还比较了MDR和PLR检测肾移植患者急性排斥(AR)相关基因与基因相互作用的性能。结果在本文中,我们通过广泛的模拟研究了MDR和PLR在病例对照研究中检测基因与基因相互作用的功能。我们比较了它们在两种双向和三种双向交互模型下的性能。我们已经研究了不同等位基因频率对这些方法的影响。我们还在真实数据集上实现了它们的性能。不出所料,对于所有数据方案,这些方法都没有一贯更好的方法,但是对于更复杂的模型,MDR通常优于PLR。对真实数据集的ROC分析表明,在检测真实数据集上的基因与基因相互作用时,MDR优于PLR。结论正如人们可能期望的那样,每种方法的相对成功取决于上下文。这项研究证明了检测基因-基因相互作用的方法的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号