...
首页> 外文期刊>Desalination >Pilot plant evaluation of advanced vs. conventional scale inhibitors for RO desalination
【24h】

Pilot plant evaluation of advanced vs. conventional scale inhibitors for RO desalination

机译:先进与常规阻垢剂用于反渗透淡化的中试评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An advanced anti-scalant, consisting of a polyacrylate and hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP), was tested against the conventional H_2SO_4 and sodium hexa-meta-phosphate (SHMP) inhibitors in a pilot plant which had parallel RO units. The two units were fitted with identical brackish hollow fine fiber (HFF) permeators arranged in a two-stage mode which received the same brackish feed water, and were operated at the same feed pressure (27.6 bar/400 psig) and product water recovery (70%). Unit #1 was treated with 9 ppm of as-received advanced anti-scalant, and unit #2 was treated with 6 ppm of SHMP and about 130 ppm of 98% H_2SO_4. The pilot plant trial lasted for 3,000 h. The techno-economic evaluation of the two scale control treatments was carried out in terms of pumping energy, the anti-sealants consumed, and the quality and total output of the product water produced in 3,000 h. The pumping energy and scale control treatment costs (as $/m~3 of water produced) were same for the two treatments; but in terms of salt rejection, product TDS and output, performance of the advanced anti-sealant was inferior; after 3,000 h the salt rejection of unit #1 (which operated on the advanced anti-sealant) was about 81% vs. 94% for unit #2 (H_2SO_4+SHMP). Similarly, in 3,000 h unit #1 produced 20% less water of unacceptable quality (620 ppm) whereas unit #2 produced more water of excellent quality (180 ppm), providing a clear testimony to the superior performance of the conventional H_2SO_4+SHMP treatment over the advanced anti-sealant.
机译:在具有平行反渗透单元的中试工厂中,针对由常规H_2SO_4和六偏磷酸钠(SHMP)抑制剂测试了由聚丙烯酸酯和羟乙叉基二膦酸酯(HEDP)组成的高级防垢剂。这两个单元均装有相同的微咸中空细纤维(HFF)渗透器,该渗透器以两阶段模式排列,可接收相同的微咸给水,并在相同的进料压力(27.6 bar / 400 psig)下运行,并回收产品水( 70%)。单元#1用9 ppm的原样高级防垢剂处理,单元#2用6 ppm的SHMP和约130 ppm的98%H_2SO_4处理。中试工厂持续了3,000小时。对两种水垢控制处理的技术经济评价是根据泵送能量,消耗的抗密封剂以及在3,000小时内生产的产水的质量和总产量进行的。两种处理的泵送能量和水垢控制处理成本(每生产水$ / m〜3)相同。但就排盐率,产品TDS和产量而言,先进的密封剂的性能较差; 3,000小时后,#1单元(在高级抗密封剂上运行)的脱盐率约为81%,而#2单元(H_2SO_4 + SHMP)的脱盐率为94%。同样,在3,000小时内,#1单元产生的水质量降低了20%(620 ppm),而#2单元产生的水质量更好(180 ppm),这清楚地证明了常规H_2SO_4 + SHMP处理的优越性能超过了先进的密封剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号