首页> 外文期刊>Desalination >Techno-economic comparison of technologies for the concentration of a mixed leachant bleed stream
【24h】

Techno-economic comparison of technologies for the concentration of a mixed leachant bleed stream

机译:混合浸出液浓缩流技术的技术经济比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a new hydrometallurgical process for recovery of lead from lead oxide secondaries, liquid effluence is minimized by jointly treating contaminated washing water and leachant bleed. To enable internal recycling of the leachant bleed and recover pure water, it is necessary to incorporate a concentration unit. In this paper different technologies for concentrating the mixed stream are compared. At a specified water recovery rate of 10 m~3/h, the total costs for mechanical vapour compression evaporation, freeze concentration and multiple effect evaporation are 13, 18 and 18 U$/m~3 of recovered water, respectively. The total costs decrease at increasing water recovery rates, but mechanical vapour compression evaporation remains the cheapest technology within the major part of the range studied (5-55 m~3/h water recovery).
机译:在一种新的湿法冶金工艺中,该工艺可从氧化铅二次氧化物中回收铅,通过共同处理受污染的洗涤水和浸出液放出物,可最大程度地减少液体排放。为了使渗出液的内部再循环并回收纯净水,必须安装浓缩装置。本文比较了浓缩混合流的不同技术。在规定的10 m〜3 / h的水回收率下,机械蒸汽压缩蒸发,冷冻浓缩和多效蒸发的总成本分别为回收水的13、18和18 U $ / m〜3。总成本随着水回收率的提高而降低,但是在研究的大部分范围内(5-55 m〜3 / h的水回收率),机械蒸汽压缩蒸发仍然是最便宜的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号