首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >What difference can a path make? Regional democracy promotion regimes in the Americas and Africa
【24h】

What difference can a path make? Regional democracy promotion regimes in the Americas and Africa

机译:路径能产生什么变化?美洲和非洲的区域民主促进制度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Regional multilateral regimes have become important instruments for promoting and defending democracy around the world. The novel nature of these regional instruments has generated a cottage industry in social science scholarship. Yet, none of these works compare the democracy promotion and defence regimes of the Organization of American States (OAS) and the African Union (AU). This article is designed to fill this gap. We argue that the unique constellation of actors that are members of each respective organization have reinforced two distinct democracy promotion and defence paths. The state-driven regime evolution characteristic of the Americas contrasts with Africa's expert-driven process of regime construction. The state-centric process of the OAS regime has bolstered a narrow interstate multilateralism that upholds traditional sovereign state prerogatives and minimizes the role for non-state actors in the promotion and defence of democracy in the Americas. The expert-driven process of AU's regime construction has fostered a legalistic approach to democratic promotion and defence in Africa and opened up space for non-state actors to play a central role in the development of regional democracy promotion and defence norms.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy promotion, path dependence, Organization of American States, African Union, international regimes, democracy charter, international normsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510341003700337
机译:区域多边政权已成为在世界范围内促进和捍卫民主的重要工具。这些区域性文书的新颖性质在社会科学奖学金中产生了手工业。然而,这些作品都没有一个比照美洲国家组织(OAS)和非洲联盟(AU)的民主促进和国防制度。本文旨在填补这一空白。我们认为,作为每个组织成员的行动者的独特星座强化了两条截然不同的民主促进和防御道路。美洲国家驱动的政权演变特征与非洲专家驱动的政权建设过程形成鲜明对比。 OAS政权以国家为中心的进程支持了狭窄的州际多边主义,该主义坚持传统的主权国家特权,并最大程度地减少了非国家行为者在美洲促进和捍卫民主方面的作用。非盟政权的专家驱动过程为非洲的民主促进和防御树立了法治方法,并为非国家行为者在发展区域民主促进和防御规范中发挥核心作用开辟了空间。查看全文下载全文关键字:民主促进,路径依赖,美洲国家组织,非洲联盟,国际制度,民主宪章,国际规范。 facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510341003700337

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号