首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Who is greener? Climate action and political regimes: trade-offs for national and international actors
【24h】

Who is greener? Climate action and political regimes: trade-offs for national and international actors

机译:谁更环保?气候行动和政治体制:国家和国际行为者之间的权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Climate change constitutes a major concern for all political regimes. The question, however, is whether different regime types show different degrees of disposition to reduce carbon emissions. Studies comparing the performance between democracies and autocracies provide us with some fundamental findings but most do not take into consideration the variety of regimes that are neither full democracies nor full autocracies. The perspective of this inquiry is one of a scholar in democracy studies aiming mainly to better understand possible trade-offs of different regime types in the context of climate change. The analysis addresses, first, the national level and discusses possible trade-offs and the difficult choices faced by democracies, autocracies, young democracies and democratizing countries in dealing with climate change. Secondly, the implications for the international level are considered, especially for democracy promoters and their policy options concerning emerging democracies and countries in transition that perform poorly in respect to climate action.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracies, autocracies, intermediate political regimes, climate change, democracy promotion, good governanceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709686
机译:气候变化是所有政治制度的主要关切。但是,问题是不同的制度类型是否表现出不同程度的处置方式以减少碳排放。比较民主政体和独裁政体绩效的研究为我们提供了一些基本发现,但大多数都没有考虑既不是完全民主国家也不是完全独裁国家的各种制度。该研究的观点是民主研究的学者之一,其主要目的是更好地理解气候变化背景下不同政体类型之间可能的取舍。该分析首先涉及国家层面,并讨论了可能的取舍以及民主,专制,年轻民主和民主国家在应对气候变化方面面临的艰难选择。其次,考虑了对国际层面的影响,特别是对于民主倡导者及其有关在气候行动方面表现不佳的新兴民主国家和转型国家的政策选择。查看全文下载全文关键词民主,独裁,中间政治体制,气候变化,民主促进,善政相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.709686

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第5期|p.865-888|共24页
  • 作者

    Marianne Kneuera*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:35

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号