首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Majoritarian democracy and globalization versus ethnic diversity?
【24h】

Majoritarian democracy and globalization versus ethnic diversity?

机译:多数民主与全球化与种族多样性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While some types of democracy can sustain ethnic and cultural diversity, others can clearly undermine it. In The Dark Side of Democracy, Michael Mann argues that extreme crimes like genocide and ethnic cleansing tend to occur, or at least be legitimized, within a majoritarian democracy framework. This article broadens Mann's approach in two directions: first, it confirms that majoritarian democracy in plural societies can provide the pre-existing institutional context where conflict, nationalism and exclusion can thrive, eventually degenerating into self-destruction. Second, it focuses on the tendency by some governments to turn to patriotism and populism as sources of legitimacy at a time when the latter appears to be crumbling. In addition, the article questions both the ‘democratic peace’ and the ‘failed democratization’ approaches for their reliance on an ideal type and fixed notion of democracy, arguing that the latter has been weakened by neoliberal globalization, particularly as it interacts with the legacy of pre-existing forms of majoritarianism. The article concludes that these forces need to be studied simultaneously in order to have a broader picture of the contemporary weakening of democratic practices and institutions within some nation-states.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdemocracy, nationalism, globalization, majoritarianism, ethnicity, diversity, neoliberalism, populismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.626947
机译:尽管某些类型的民主可以维持种族和文化多样性,但其他类型的民主显然可以破坏它。迈克尔·曼(Michael Mann)在《民主的黑暗面》中指出,种族灭绝和种族清洗等极端犯罪往往在多数派民主框架内发生或至少被合法化。本文从两个方向拓宽了曼恩的方法:首先,它证实了多元社会中的多数民主可以提供冲突,民族主义和排他性可以繁荣发展,最终退化为自我毁灭的先前存在的制度环境。第二,它着眼于一些政府倾向于在爱国主义和民粹主义崩溃之际将其作为合法性来源的趋势。此外,该文章质疑“民主和平”和“失败的民主化”方法是否依赖于理想的民主类型和固定的民主观念,并认为后者已受到新自由主义全球化的削弱,特别是因为它与先前存在的多数主义形式的遗产相互作用。这篇文章的结论是,需要对这些力量进行同时研究,以更广泛地了解当代一些民族国家内部民主实践和制度的弱化。查看全文下载全文关键字民主,民族主义,全球化,专制主义,种族,多样性,新自由主义,populismRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.626947

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第4期|p.789-811|共23页
  • 作者

    Daniele Conversiab*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号