首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Caste and democratization in postcolonial India: an ethnographic examination of lower caste politics in Bihar
【24h】

Caste and democratization in postcolonial India: an ethnographic examination of lower caste politics in Bihar

机译:后殖民印度的种姓制度与民主化:比哈尔邦对下种姓政治的民族志考察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines the case of lower-caste politics in the populous north Indian state of Bihar in order to show the ways in which the liberal democratic model fails to capture the realities of democracy in postcolonial India. In order to explain the rise of lower-caste politics, I examine the ways in which relationships between state institutions, caste networks and locally dominant groups shape contemporary political possibilities, necessitating a re-evaluation of the relationship between liberalism and democracy in India. With state institutions being unable to effectively enforce rights, a caste-based notion of popular sovereignty became dominant - as an idea (the lower-caste majority should rule) and as the everyday rough-and-tumble of an electoral politics that ultimately revolves around the force of numbers. It is inadequate, and actually unhelpful, to simply point out the obvious fact that the enforcement of rights is routinely and systematically undermined in practice and to call for more effective implementation. In fact, I argue that effective implementation in places such as Bihar could only be possible through a radical restructuring of local power that can only come from below, through democratic practice itself.View full textDownload full textKeywordscaste, democracy, postcolonial, India, BiharRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.593327
机译:本文研究了人口稠密的北印度比哈尔邦的低种姓政治状况,以显示自由民主模式未能抓住后殖民时期印度民主现实的方式。为了解释低种姓政治的兴起,我考察了国家机构,种姓网络和地方优势集团之间的关系如何塑造当代政治可能性,从而有必要重新评估印度的自由主义与民主之间的关系。由于国家机构无法有效地行使权利,基于种姓的民众主权概念成为一种主导(作为低种姓占多数的统治者),并且随着选举政治的日趋坎rough而最终围绕数字的力量。仅指出显而易见的事实,即在实践中例行和系统地破坏权利的实施,并呼吁更有效地执行,是不充分的,实际上是无助的。事实上,我认为,只有通过民主实践本身,才能通过根本的地方权力根本重组来实现在比哈尔邦等地的有效实施。查看全文下载全文关键字scaste,民主,后殖民地,印度,比哈尔邦相关变量addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.593327

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2012年第2期|p.312-333|共22页
  • 作者

    Jeffrey Witsoea*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:06:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号