...
首页> 外文期刊>Decision Line >Sourcing Decisions under Conditions of Risk and Resilience: A Behavioral Study
【24h】

Sourcing Decisions under Conditions of Risk and Resilience: A Behavioral Study

机译:在风险和弹性条件下采购决策:行为研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article continues a recent trend of exploring the linkages between supply chain risk, resilience and decision-making at an individual level. Specifically, the article reports the results of a behavioral study that explores whether and how the perceptions of supply chain risk and resilience influence the decisions made regarding the selection of a new source of critical components. The study uses a full factorial design for a scenario-based role-playing experiment involving over 1,000 valid responses drawn from multiple sampling pools including supply chain managers, students, and crowd-sourced respondents. The results indicate that the perception of supply chain resilience-whether it is by systemic resilience communication, such as training or corporate pronouncements, or through personal exposure-significantly influences decision-making, although personal exposure appears to have a stronger impact on the outcome. This relationship is significantly moderated by the risk propensity of the individual decision-makers. The article concludes with a discussion of the results and their implication for both theory and practice. The discussion provides a framework for integrating the macro and micro levels by arguing that the micro issues can potentially moderate and mediate the relationships and findings observed at the macro level. Failure to integrate the micro effects can result in variance that the macro-level analysis is unable to explain.
机译:本文仍在继续探索供应链风险,弹性和决策之间的联系的趋势。具体而言,文章报告了行为研究的结果,探讨了供应链风险和恢复力的看法是否以及如何影响关于选择对关键组成部分新来源的决定。该研究使用完整的因素设计,以实现基于方案的角色播放实验,涉及从多个采样池中汲取的超过1,000个有效响应,包括供应链管理器,学生和人群受访者。结果表明,供应链弹性的感知 - 无论是通过全身抵御沟通,如培训或企业发表,还是通过个人曝光 - 显着影响决策,尽管个人暴露似乎对结果产生了更强烈的影响。这种关系受到个别决策者的风险倾向的显着调节。本文讨论了结果及其对理论和实践的影响。该讨论提供了一种用于通过争论微观问题可以潜在的中等和介导在宏观层面观察到的关系和发现来集成宏观和微观水平的框架。未能集成微量效果可能导致宏观级别分析无法解释的方差。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Decision Line》 |2020年第4期|985-1014|共30页
  • 作者单位

    Portland State Univ Sch Business Adm KMC 430K 631 SW Harrison St Portland OR 97201 USA;

    Michigan State Univ Dept Supply Chain Management Eli Broad Coll Business 632 Bogue St E Lansing MI 48824 USA;

    Florida Atlantic Univ Dept Informat Technol & Operat Management Coll Business Boca Raton FL 33431 USA;

    Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ Dept Business Informat Technol Pamplin Coll Business 1007 Pamplin Hall Blacksburg VA 24061 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Behavioral Study; Resilience; Risk Propensity; Risk-Taking intentions; Supply Risk;

    机译:行为研究;弹性;风险倾向;冒险的意图;供应风险;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号