首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Two Senses of Justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy
【24h】

Two Senses of Justice: Confucianism, Rawls, and Comparative Political Philosophy

机译:两种正义感:儒家,罗尔斯和比较政治哲学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper argues that a comparative study of the idea of a sense of justice in the work of John Rawls and the early Chinese philosopher Kongzi is mutually beneficial to our understanding of the thought of both figures. It also aims to provide an example of the relevance of moral psychology for basic questions in political philosophy. The paper offers an analysis of Rawls’s account of a sense of justice and its place within his theory of justice, focusing on the features of this capacity and how it develops. It then provides an account of the sense of justice in Kongzi’s thought as it is seen in the Analects. Finally, it shows how examining the similarities and differences between the two accounts can deepen our understanding of both views, as well as our appreciation for the importance of understanding how a sense of justice develops.
机译:本文认为,对约翰·罗尔斯(John Rawls)和早期中国哲学家孔子(Kongzi)的作品中的正义感进行比较研究,对于我们对这两个数字思想的理解是互利的。它还旨在提供一个范例,说明道德心理学与政治哲学中的基本问题相关。该论文分析了罗尔斯对正义感的描述及其在正义论中的地位,着眼于这种能力的特征及其发展方式。然后,从《论语》中可以看出孔子思想中的正义感。最后,它显示了研究两个叙述之间的异同如何能够加深我们对两种观点的理解,以及我们对理解正义感如何发展的重要性的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号