首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Ziran and Wuwei in the Daodejing : An Ethical Assessment
【24h】

Ziran and Wuwei in the Daodejing : An Ethical Assessment

机译:道德经中的子然与无为:伦理评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Daoist philosophy, the self is understood as an individual interdependent with others, and situated within a broader environment. Within this framework, the concept ziran is frequently understood in terms of naturalness or nature while wuwei is explained in terms of non-oppressive government. In many existing accounts, little is done to connect these two key Daoist concepts. Here, I suggest that wuwei and ziran are correlated, ethical, concepts. Together, they provide a unifying ethical framework for understanding the philosophy of the Daodejing. I explore the meaning of ziran as self-so-ness or, in human terms, as pertaining to an individual’s spontaneity. The appropriate response to the spontaneity of individuals is to avoid, insofar as possible, imposing or using restrictive norms and methods, that is, wuwei. According to this view, ziran and wuwei offer an account of ethics that attends to core notions of interdependent selfhood, including mutuality, relationality, interdependence, symbiosis, and responsiveness.
机译:在道家哲学中,自我被理解为是一个与他人相互依存的个体,位于一个更广阔的环境中。在此框架内,人们通常以自然或自然的方式来理解子语的概念,而以非压迫性政府来解释武威。在许多现有的帐户中,几乎没有什么工作可以将这两个主要的道教概念联系起来。在这里,我建议将“无为”和“子然”联系起来,是符合道德的概念。它们共同提供了一个统一的道德框架,用于理解《道德经》的哲学。我探讨了ziran的含义,即自我社交,或者用人类的话来说,与个人的自发性有关。对个人自发性的适当应对是在可能的情况下避免施加或使用限制性规范和方法,即无为。根据这种观点,子然和无为提供了一种道德观,涉及相互依存的自我概念,包括相互关系,关系,相互依存,共生和反应能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2007年第4期|p.325-337|共13页
  • 作者

    Karyn Lai;

  • 作者单位

    School of Philosophy, University of New South Wales, 2052 Sydney, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Daoism - Daoist ethics - ziran - Wuwei - Spontaneity;

    机译:道教-道教伦理-子染-武威-自发性;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:19:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号