首页> 外文期刊>Dao >An Approach to Emerson’s Writing Style from a Daoist Perspective
【24h】

An Approach to Emerson’s Writing Style from a Daoist Perspective

机译:道家视角下的艾默生写作风格探究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

There is a clear and controlling philosophical concern that governs Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essays: freedom from limitation and self-reliance from external authority. What makes it difficult to understand his essays, however, is his style, which is characterized by disconnection, paradox, and negation. These rhetorical techniques make the meaning of his writings elusive and slippery. Though many scholars have analyzed Emerson’s style, none have approached it through the writings of Laozi, an ancient Chinese philosopher. There are two reasons I compare Emerson and Laozi. First, in spite of their differences, there are important parallel themes and stylistic innovations in their writings. Second, attentiveness to a key figure in the Eastern philosophical tradition can help to explain how Emerson’s thoughts disappoint Western readers, precisely because they employ techniques beyond the method of habitual intellect in the Western frame. This essay tries to approach several features in Emerson’s writing style from a Daoist perspective to show that both philosophers purposefully use linguistic strategies such as disconnection, paradox, and negation to provoke readers into participating in understanding truth, instead of telling them directly what truth is.
机译:拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生(Ralph Waldo Emerson)的文章有一个清晰而可控的哲学问题:不受限制的自由和来自外部权威的自我依赖。然而,使他的论文难以理解的是他的风格,这种风格的特点是脱节,悖论和否定。这些修辞手法使他的著作含义难以捉摸。尽管许多学者分析了爱默生的风格,但没有人通过中国古代哲学家老子的著作来探讨这种风格。我比较爱默生和老子有两个原因。首先,尽管它们之间存在差异,但它们的著作中仍存在重要的平行主题和风格创新。其次,对东方哲学传统中的关键人物的专心可以帮助解释爱默生的思想如何使西方读者失望,这恰恰是因为他们采用的技术超出了西方框架中的惯常智力方法。本文试图从道家的角度探讨爱默生的写作风格中的几个特征,以表明两位哲学家都故意使用诸如脱节,悖论和否定之类的语言策略来激发读者参与理解真理,而不是直接告诉他们真理是什么。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2008年第3期|p.295-306|共12页
  • 作者

    Leng Wang;

  • 作者单位

    Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, 26 Hua Qiao Road, Building 4, Room 304, Nanjing, 210029, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Emerson - Daoism - Disconnection - Paradox - Negation;

    机译:艾默生-道教-脱节-悖论-否定;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:19:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号