首页> 外文期刊>Dao >In the World of Persons: The Personhood Debate in the Analects and Zhuangzi
【24h】

In the World of Persons: The Personhood Debate in the Analects and Zhuangzi

机译:人间世界:论语和庄子中的人格辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article is an examination of a debate between Confucians and Zhuangists surrounding the notion of moral personhood as understood in the early Confucian tradition. This debate takes place across texts—most importantly in the Confucian challenge of Analects 18.5-7 and the Zhuangist response of the Renjianshi chapter of the Zhuangzi. In better understanding the disagreement between these two schools, we can come to a clearer picture of the notion of personhood at stake. The Zhuangist reaction to the Confucian position on personhood helps to demonstrate that the Confucians held a conception of the person as communally constructed. Such a view, I argue, can be of great use in contemporary debates surrounding agency, moral responsibility, and moral development. After offering an outline of the Confucian position, I consider various Zhuangist objections both in the Analects and Renjianshi chapter, before considering what I take to be convincing Confucian responses to the Zhuangist objections.
机译:本文是对儒家和壮族之间围绕道德人格观念的辩论的考察,这是儒家早期传统所理解的。这场辩论是跨文本进行的,最重要的是在儒家对《论语》 18.5-7的挑战以及对《庄子》的《人间世》一章的庄家的回应中。为了更好地理解这两种流派之间的分歧,我们可以更清楚地了解人格化的概念。庄家对儒家人格立场的反应有助于证明儒家对人的观念是共同建构的。我认为,这种观点在围绕代理,道德责任和道德发展的当代辩论中很有用。在概述了儒家的立场之后,我将在《论语》和《任剑石》一章中考虑各种壮族的反对意见,然后再考虑要说服儒家对壮族的反对意见做出回应。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2012年第4期|p.437-457|共21页
  • 作者

    Alexus McLeod;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy, University of Dayton, 300 College Park, Dayton, OH, 45469-1546, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Confucianism; Analects; Zhuangzi; Personhood; Agency;

    机译:儒学;论语;庄子;人格;机构;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:19:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号