首页> 外文期刊>Dao >Does Zhu Xi Distinguish Prudence from Morality?
【24h】

Does Zhu Xi Distinguish Prudence from Morality?

机译:朱熹区分谨慎吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In Stephen Angle’s Sagehood, he contends that Neo-Confucian philosophers reject ways of moral thinking that draw hard and fast lines between self-directed or prudential concerns (about what is good for me) and other-directed or moral concerns (about what is right, just, virtuous, etc.), and suggests that they are right to do so. In this paper, I spell out Angle’s arguments and interpretation in greater detail and then consider whether they are faithful to one of the chief figures in Neo-Confucian thought. I begin by identifying some of the better-known ways in which moral philosophers give special treatment to prudential considerations, and say which of these Angle’s reading of the Neo-Confucians appears to rule out. After laying this groundwork, I proceed to test Angle’s interpretation against the moral thought of history’s most influential Neo-Confucian philosopher, Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1130-1200), arguing that even on Angle’s own reading, there are certain respects in which Zhu preserves the distinction, although by Angle’s lights these ways are perhaps less pernicious than their contemporary equivalents. I also look closely at how Angle uses the psychological structure of humane love (ren 仁) to undermine the prudence-versus-morality distinction. Here I suggest that the better way to phrase his point is to say that prudence drops out or becomes an ethically incoherent concept, which is something quite different from rejecting or collapsing the distinction between prudence and morality.
机译:在斯蒂芬角度的恶作剧中,他认为新儒家哲学家拒绝道德思维方式,在自我指导或谨慎的关注(关于对我有什么好处)和其他导向或道德问题之间的努力和快速线条(关于什么是正确的,只是,善良等),并表明他们是正确的。在本文中,我更详细地拼出了角度的论点和解释,然后考虑他们是否忠于新儒家思想中的主要人物之一。我首先识别道德哲学家对审慎考虑的特殊治疗的一些更好的方式,并说这些角度读的新儒家的阅读似乎排除了。在铺设这个基础之后,我继续测试角度对历史上最具影响力的新儒家哲学家的道德思想的解释,朱熹朱熹(1130-1200),争论即使是角度自己的阅读,朱镕基也有某些方面的尊重虽然由角度的灯光,但这些方式可能比当代等同物更不好。我也仔细观察角度如何使用人文爱情的心理结构(仁仁)来破坏谨慎 - 与道德区别。在这里,我建议说明他的观点的更好方法是说谨慎地辍学或成为一个道德不连贯的概念,这与拒绝或折叠审慎和道德之间的区别是完全不同的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dao》 |2013年第3期|359-368|共10页
  • 作者

    Justin Tiwald;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Philosophy San Francisco State University">(1);

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Neo-Confucianism; Zhu Xi; Prudence;

    机译:neo-Confucianism;Z虎ξ;prudence;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-19 02:03:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号