...
首页> 外文期刊>Dam Engineering >A Comparison Between 2D and 3D Seepage Analysis Results in Earth Dams Constructed in Narrow Valleys (Case Study: Haaleh Dam)
【24h】

A Comparison Between 2D and 3D Seepage Analysis Results in Earth Dams Constructed in Narrow Valleys (Case Study: Haaleh Dam)

机译:狭窄山谷中修建的土坝的2D和3D渗流分析结果的比较(案例研究:Haaleh Dam)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The most common method used in seepage analysis of earth dams is performing a 2D analysis on the maximum cross-section, and generalizing its results to the third dimension. As a normal consequence of this method the effect of the valley shape, and changes in material properties along the third dimension, are ignored. In this research both 2D and 3D transient seepage analyses have been performed, using the Haaleh Dam in Iran as a case study. The results have then been compared with the values obtained via instrumentation, which reveal that 2D and 3D seepage analyses show acceptable conformity with the instrumentation results in the first few months after the start of impoundment. However, by elapsing the time needed by the dam's body and foundation materials to become saturated, 3D analysis results continue to show conformity with the instrumentation results, but the results of the 2D seepage analysis lose this concordance, and the difference between 2D analysis and instrumentation results increases.
机译:土坝渗流分析中最常用的方法是对最大横截面进行二维分析,并将其结果推广到第三维。作为该方法的正常结果,可以忽略谷形状的影响以及材料属性沿第三维的变化。在这项研究中,已经进行了2D和3D瞬态渗流分析,并以伊朗的Haaleh大坝为例。然后将结果与通过仪器获得的值进行了比较,结果表明2D和3D渗流分析表明在蓄水开始后的最初几个月中与仪器结果具有可接受的一致性。但是,通过消除大坝主体和地基材料达到饱和所需的时间,3D分析结果继续显示与仪器结果一致,但是2D渗流分析的结果失去了这种一致性,并且2D分析与仪器之间的差异结果增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号