...
首页> 外文期刊>Cycle world >THE BIG QUESTION WHY DO ALTERNATIVE FRONT SUSPENSIONS STAY MOSTLY ALTERNATIVE AS THE TELESCOPIC FORK PREVAILS?
【24h】

THE BIG QUESTION WHY DO ALTERNATIVE FRONT SUSPENSIONS STAY MOSTLY ALTERNATIVE AS THE TELESCOPIC FORK PREVAILS?

机译:大问题为什么交替前悬架在大多数情况下仍会像伸缩叉一样流行?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

After so many promising beginnings by chassis innovators, why has it taken so long for a non-telescopic front end to reach a mass market? BMW's Telelever (derived from the Saxon-Motodd suspension), combining telescopic fork legs with an A-arm, arrived in 1994 but has had only limited use. When suspension of the highest performance was required for that company's S1000RR sportbike, a conventional (but highly refined) telescopic fork was chosen. When Dorna created Moto2, a "torrent of chassis innovation" was predicted, but only a "conformity of success" has resulted.
机译:在底盘创新者开创了这么多有希望的开端之后,为什么非望远镜式前端要花这么长时间才能进入大众市场?宝马的Tel​​elever(取自Saxon-Motodd悬架)结合了伸缩式叉形支腿和A型臂,于1994年问世,但用途有限。当该公司的S1000RR运动摩托车需要最高性能的悬挂时,选择了传统的(但精制)伸缩叉。当Dorna创建Moto2时,曾预言“底盘创新的激流”,但仅产生了“成功的整合”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cycle world》 |2018年第1期|37-39|共3页
  • 作者

    Kevin Cameron;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号