首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >AGAINST THE COMMODIFICATION OF EVERYTHING
【24h】

AGAINST THE COMMODIFICATION OF EVERYTHING

机译:反对一切的商品化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Cultural studies is in a difficult position if it wants to find itself on the side of democracy against neo-liberalism in this age of ecological crisis. A great deal of the deconstructive, anti-essentialist, post-humanist, post-modernist thinking of recent decades has undermined the grounds upon which earlier generations understood the commodification of the world to be distasteful. In the absence of any normative conception of humanity, community, or nature, why not succumb to the deterritorializing thrill which the marketization of everything promises? The liberal defence of consumer culture which characterized a whole genre of work in cultural studies is clearly unable to answer this question, predicated as it is on a now wholly anachronistic critique of mid-century discourses of austerity, restraint, and patriarchal normativity. This might seem to leave us with a choice of either reverting to the prescriptive Marxism of pre-1960s cultural theory or accepting the job offered to us by the neo-liberal university: of training smart, reflexive, ironic hedonists to work and consume efficiently in the knowledge economy. However, there is another way. An attentive and nuanced reading of post-structuralist and post-Marxist philosophy, as well as older resources for cultural theory, can provide the basis for a democratic and anti-essentialist critique of consumerism as a normative paradigm which erases difference and silences political discussion by the violent imposition of particular modes of relationality (in particular that of the customer/seller relationship) on every social scene. It is from the perspective of a politics which tries to keep open the possibility of other, multiple modes of relationality, rather than one which wishes to impose a singular utopian blueprint on the future, that cultural studies can play a useful role in critiquing the hegemony of consumerism and competitive individualism without succumbing to the temptations of too much socialist nostalgia.
机译:如果文化研究想在这个生态危机时代站在反对新自由主义的民主立场上,那么它就处于困境。近几十年来,许多破坏性的,反本质的,后人道主义的,后现代的思想破坏了前代人理解世界商品化令人讨厌的基础。在没有关于人类,社区或自然的任何规范性概念的情况下,为什么不屈服于一切事物的市场化所带来的去域化刺激呢?消费文化的自由防御是整个文化研究工作的特征,显然无法回答这个问题,因为它是基于对世纪中期紧缩,克制和父权制规范性论述现在完全不合时宜的批评。这似乎使我们有选择要么恢复到1960年代以前的文化主义的马克思主义,要么接受新自由大学提供给我们的工作:训练聪明,反身,讽刺的享乐主义者在其中有效地工作和消费。知识经济。但是,还有另一种方法。对后结构主义和后马克思主义哲学的细致入微的阅读,以及对文化理论的较旧资源,可以为民主和反本质主义的消费主义批评提供基础,该批判主义消灭了差异并沉默了政治讨论。在每个社交场景上对特定的关系模式(特别是客户/卖方关系的关系)施加暴力。从政治学的角度试图保持其他多种关系模式的可能性,而不是希望对未来施加单一的乌托邦蓝图的文化,文化研究可以在批判霸权方面发挥有益的作用。消费主义和竞争性个人主义,却不屈服于太多的社会主义怀旧之情。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号