首页> 外文期刊>Cost engineering >Scheduled Overtime and Loss of Productivity; Fact or Fiction? A Business Roundtable Report
【24h】

Scheduled Overtime and Loss of Productivity; Fact or Fiction? A Business Roundtable Report

机译:预定的加班时间和生产力损失;事实还是虚构?业务圆桌会议报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the frequently-cited and relied upon documents in construction litigation is the 1980 Business Roundtable Report (BRT), entitled, "Scheduled Overtime Effects On Construction Projects." The BRT Report's continuity is based on the deep chasm that often exists between case arguments and case facts. In cases where direct documentary evidence is not available or of insufficient quality to discretely quantify or analyze labor productivity, consultants and experts look to published studies and industry publications, like the BRT's to aid in their analyses of labor efficiency and to aid in forming their opinions. This process is, in itself, a methodological hurdle, characterized by evaluating all methods and studies available to the expert/consultant and applying them. However, little attention has been paid to evaluating the studies themselves.
机译:1980年商业圆桌会议报告(BRT)是建筑诉讼中经常引用和依赖的文件之一,其标题为“计划的加班时间对建筑项目的影响”。 BRT报告的连续性基于案例论点与案例事实之间经常存在的深层鸿沟。如果没有直接的书面证据或质量不足以离散地量化或分析劳动生产率,则顾问和专家会寻求已发表的研究报告和行业出版物,例如BRT,以帮助他们分析劳动效率并形成意见。 。这个过程本身就是方法上的障碍,其特征在于评估专家/顾问可用的所有方法和研究并加以应用。但是,很少有人去评估研究本身。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号