首页> 外文期刊>Cost engineering >False Claims: Road Embankment Construction Proves to Be a Slippery Slope for Contractors
【24h】

False Claims: Road Embankment Construction Proves to Be a Slippery Slope for Contractors

机译:虚假主张:道路堤防施工对承包商来说是一个滑坡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many construction companies have built their reputations and coffers working on large public sector projects. While the rewards can be great, working for public agencies is not without risk; particularly if a contractor's intentions are less than honorable. Daewoo Engineering and Construction, a major international contractor recently learned this lesson the hard way. In what can only be described as a stinging decision, the US Court of Federal Claims ruled in Daewoo Engineering and Construction Co., Ltd. V. United States 73 Fed. Cl. 547 (2006) that Daewoo had knowingly submitted "false or fraudulent claims with an intent to deceive or mislead the government" in violation of the False Claims Act ("FCA") and the Contract Disputes Act. ("CDA") The verdict may end up costing Daewoo Engineering more than $50 million.
机译:许多建筑公司已经在大型公共部门项目中建立了自己的声誉和金库。尽管回报可能是巨大的,但为公共机构工作并非没有风险。特别是如果承包商的意图不兑现。一个主要的国际承包商大宇工程建设公司最近通过艰辛的方式学习了这一课。美国联邦索赔法院在大宇工程建设有限公司诉V.美国73联邦案中作出裁决,这只能说是一个刺人的决定。 Cl。 547(2006),大宇故意违反了“虚假索赔法”(FCA)和“合同纠纷法”,提出了“意图欺骗或误导政府的虚假或欺诈性索赔”。 (“ CDA”)该判决最终可能使大宇工程公司损失超过5000万美元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号