【24h】

PFI's premiers

机译:PFI的第一个

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Just over a decade ago, with the economy in the depths of recession, few could have imagined that a revolution was about to take place in public sector procurement, that would transform its whole approach to major construction projects. At the time, the public purse was almost empty. So, under-fire Tory chancellor Norman Lamont suggested that the Design, Build, Finance and Operate model that had been used successfully on Trafalgar House's Dartford Crossing could be considered for other building projects such as roads, and even schools and hospitals. But while the Tories saw DBFO, or the private finance initiative as it would rapidly become known, largely as a means of getting public capital expenditure off the balance sheet, the New Labour administration that succeeded them in 1997 was convinced it had wider benefits in terms of the quality of the building projects it could deliver. And, despite a bitter battle between New Labour and many of its traditional supporters -notably the unions - they have remained unshaken in that belief.
机译:就在十年前,随着经济处于衰退的深渊,几乎没有人能想到公共部门采购将发生一场革命,这将把其整个方法转变为大型建筑项目。当时,公共钱包几乎是空的。因此,有火力的保守党总理诺曼·拉蒙特(Norman Lamont)建议,已经在Trafalgar House的Dartford Crossing上成功使用的设计,建造,财务和运营模型可以考虑用于道路,学校甚至医院等其他建筑项目。但是,尽管保守党认为DBFO或迅速被人们熟知的私人融资计划主要是为了使公共资本支出脱离资产负债表,但在1997年接替他们的新工党政府坚信,就财政而言,它具有更大的收益。可以交付的建筑项目的质量。而且,尽管新工党与其许多传统支持者(尤其是工会)之间进行了激战,但他们仍然坚守这一信念。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Contract Journal》 |2003年第6422期|p.14|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:55

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号