...
首页> 外文期刊>Construction and Building Materials >Comparative laboratory evaluation of macro texture depth of surface coatings with standard volumetric test methods
【24h】

Comparative laboratory evaluation of macro texture depth of surface coatings with standard volumetric test methods

机译:用标准体积测试方法比较实验室评估表面涂层宏观纹理深度的能力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this research, macro texture depth of surface coatings including chip seals and slurry seals were evaluated with two volumetric test methods. Chip seals and slurry seals, one hundred in total, were manufactured with different aggregate types and grading sizes. Mean texture depths (MTDs) of each sample were computed via sand patch and outflow meter tests according to ASTM E 965-12 and ASTM E 2380-12, respectively. Applicability of both test methods was examined and relative differences in MTDs for chip seal and slurry seal samples were determined as 21% in average. As a result, each test method is able to specify the MTDs with increasing aggregate sizes; whereas 6 mm MTD can be identified as a threshold for implementation of outflow meter test. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,通过两种体积测试方法评估了包括切屑密封和浆料密封在内的表面涂层宏观织构深度。碎屑密封和泥浆密封总共有一百种,它们的骨料类型和分级大小不同。分别根据ASTM E 965-12和ASTM E 2380-12通过沙块和流出流量计测试来计算每个样品的平均质地深度(MTD)。检查了这两种测试方法的适用性,并将芯片密封和浆料密封样品的MTD的相对差异确定为平均21%。结果,每种测试方法都可以指定随着合计大小增加而增加的MTD。而6毫米MTD可被确定为执行流出流量计测试的阈值。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号