首页> 外文期刊>Conflict, security & development >'To romanticise or not to romanticise the local': local agency and peacebuilding in the Balkans
【24h】

'To romanticise or not to romanticise the local': local agency and peacebuilding in the Balkans

机译:“浪漫或不浪漫当地的”:地方代理和巴尔干地区的建设和平

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the last decade there has been increasing attention within peace and conflict studies on the so-called 'local turn' in peacebuilding where the role of local actors, their agency and their relationship to international actors is strongly emphasised. Still, even with widespread academic optimism about the emancipatory potential of the local, strong caveats of 'not romanticising the local' are constantly repeated. By looking at the Balkan countries and their traditional practices of peacebuilding, this article asks whether the local has the potential to be the empowering agent or if such expectations are much too ambitious, both at the academic and policy level. Drawing on the research findings which show the persistence of coercive and non-coercive local peacebuilding practices, the article poses the Paris question once again: should liberal peacebuilding be saved, and if so, where are the locals in this rescue attempt?
机译:在过去十年中,在强烈强调,在建设中所谓的“当地扭转”中所谓的“当地扭转”,强烈强调,在和平和冲突研究中,在建设中所谓的“当地扭转”,强烈强调。尽管如此,仍然具有广泛的学术乐观,即使当地的解放潜力,不断重复“不浪漫的浪漫主义”的强烈警告。通过查看巴尔干国家及其传统的建设和平实践,本文询问当地是否有可能成为赋权的代理人,或者如果此类期望在学术和政策层面都太雄心勃勃。绘制研究调查结果,展示了胁迫和非强制性地方建设和平实践的持久性,这篇文章再次摆脱了巴黎问题:应该保存自由建设和平建设,如果是的话,本地人在哪里尝试?

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号