首页> 外文期刊>Conflict, security & development >Liberia Incorporated: military contracting, cohesion and inclusion in Charles Taylor's Liberia
【24h】

Liberia Incorporated: military contracting, cohesion and inclusion in Charles Taylor's Liberia

机译:利比里亚公司:查尔斯·泰勒的利比里亚的军事承包,凝聚力和包容性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the existing literature, compensation is often understood to be an inferior source of cohesion in military organisations. Through an investigation of the militias who fought for Charles Taylor's government of Liberia, this paper makes three claims. Firstly, the organisation of these forces was looser than is often claimed in previous literature, which assumes tight and often coercive military patrimonialism. Consequently, the militias did not enjoy the interpersonal bonds of solidarity that have dominated recent cohesion literature. Secondly, since Taylor chose to suppress attempts to build cohesion around ethnicity, it played a subordinate role in unifying the militias.Thirdly, Taylor instead relied on military contracting and compensation, which allowed for the broad mobilisation of forces. The combination of militias'hopes of inclusion into the state patrimony and insufficient-resources to realise this left the cohesion of the militias fragile. Ultimately, this paper questions both whether Taylor had any choice but to resort to compensation in a context with a weak state and fragmented social organisation, and also whether the strategy is as inefficient as often thought.
机译:在现有文献中,补偿通常被认为是军事组织内凝聚力的次等来源。通过对为查尔斯·泰勒(Charles Taylor)的利比里亚政府战斗的民兵进行调查,本文提出了三点主张。首先,这些部队的组织比以前文献中经常声称的更为松散,而先前的文献则假定军事继承主义是紧迫且往往是强制性的。因此,民兵不享有在最近的凝聚力文学中占主导地位的人际关系纽带。其次,由于泰勒选择镇压建立种族凝聚力的企图,因此在统一民兵方面起了从属作用;第三,泰勒取而代之的是依靠军事承包和补偿,这使部队得以广泛动员。民兵将其纳入国家遗产的希望与资源不足以实现这一目标相结合,使民兵的凝聚力变得脆弱。最终,本文不仅质疑泰勒是否除了在状态薄弱,社会组织分散的情况下诉诸薪酬以外是否还有其他选择,而且还质疑该战略是否像人们通常认为的那样效率低下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号