Security managers who are responsible for managing corporate firewalls, virtual private network (VPN) gateways, routers and other devices will understand the headaches I'm facing this week. Prior to my arrival a few months back, my company was primarily a Check Point FireWall-1 shop. However, the company recently decided to switch to PIX firewalls from Cisco Systems Inc. Personally, I'm a big advocate of the firewall products from Redwood City, Calif.-based Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. There's nothing wrong with Cisco's PIX products, but I've found myself having to climb a steep learning curve while coping with a rule base that's becoming increasingly unmanageable. And I'm trying to find a way to centralize management of security devices so that we don't need a different tool for every device.
展开▼
机译:负责管理公司防火墙,虚拟专用网络(VPN)网关,路由器和其他设备的安全经理将理解我本周面临的头痛。在我几个月前到达之前,我的公司主要是Check Point FireWall-1商店。但是,该公司最近决定从Cisco Systems Inc.改用PIX防火墙。就我个人而言,我是总部位于加利福尼亚州红木市的Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.的防火墙产品的拥护者。Cisco的PIX产品没有错,但是我发现自己必须克服陡峭的学习曲线,同时还要应对越来越难以管理的规则库。而且我正在尝试找到一种集中管理安全设备的方法,以便我们不需要为每个设备都使用不同的工具。
展开▼