...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Structures >Response simulating interpolation methods for expanding experimental data based on numerical shape functions
【24h】

Response simulating interpolation methods for expanding experimental data based on numerical shape functions

机译:基于数值形状函数的响应模拟插值方法扩展实验数据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

An important issue in the existing interpolation methods is that their estimation accuracy usually cannot satisfy the analytical demand to expand experimental data, especially in the case of a few sample points, due to the essential deficiency of physical significance. To address the issue, this study presents an innovative category of interpolation methods which integrates the interpolation with the simulated response characteristics of experimental model. And two specific ones are proposed: the ordinary response simulating method (ORS) and the derivative response simulating method (DRS). ORS takes numerical shape functions simulated by a mechanical model as weighting functions based on general interpolation formula. DRS introduces the simulated model response as a priori estimate of response field, leading to the improvement of interpolation accuracy. Moreover, the two methods are verified through a quasi-real model considering randomness of both load and model defect as well as nonlinearities of material and geometry. It shows that DRS is usually more precise while ORS is more universal as the utilization of model information to different degrees. In sum, both demonstrate their excellent estimation performance and broad development prospects as a new category of interpolation methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:现有内插方法的一个重要问题是,由于物理意义的本质缺陷,它们的估计精度通常不能满足扩展实验数据的分析需求,尤其是在几个采样点的情况下。为了解决这个问题,本研究提出了一种创新的插值方法类别,该方法将插值与实验模型的模拟响应特性相结合。提出了两种具体的方法:普通响应模拟方法(ORS)和微分响应模拟方法(DRS)。 ORS根据通用插值公式,将由机械模型模拟的数值形状函数作为加权函数。 DRS引入了仿真模型响应作为响应场的先验估计,从而提高了插值精度。此外,考虑到载荷和模型缺陷的随机性以及材料和几何形状的非线性,通过准实模型验证了这两种方法。它表明DRS通常更精确,而ORS由于在不同程度上利用模型信息而更加通用。综上所述,作为一种新型的插值方法,两者都显示出了优异的估计性能和广阔的发展前景。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Computers & Structures》 |2019年第7期|1-8|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China;

    Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Minist Educ, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China|Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Smart Prevent & Mitigat Civil Engn Disast, Minist Ind & Informat Technol, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China;

    Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Transportat Sci & Engn, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China;

    Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Minist Educ, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China|Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Smart Prevent & Mitigat Civil Engn Disast, Minist Ind & Informat Technol, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China;

    Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Struct Dynam Behav & Control, Minist Educ, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China|Harbin Inst Technol, Key Lab Smart Prevent & Mitigat Civil Engn Disast, Minist Ind & Informat Technol, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Response simulating; Interpolation method; Numerical shape function; Quasi-real model; Randomized test;

    机译:响应模拟插值法数值形状函数拟实模型随机检验;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号