首页> 外文期刊>Computers & operations research >Two heuristics for the capacitated multi-period cutting stock problem with pattern setup cost
【24h】

Two heuristics for the capacitated multi-period cutting stock problem with pattern setup cost

机译:图案设置成本的电容多时期扦插股票问题的两个启发式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper concentrates on a capacitated multi-period cutting stock problem. In the production process, multiple identical input rods can be bundled together and cut simultaneously. We say that these input rods are cut with the same pattern. Vanderbeck (2000) once noted that changing from one pattern to another involves significant setup times (to adjust for knife positions) and costs (e.g., those associated with waste from trial runs); thus, the pattern setup cost cannot be neglected. In this paper, we therefore consider the capacitated multi-period cutting stock problem with pattern setup cost. In this regard, we aim to determine the patterns and occurrence of such patterns in each decision period over the planning horizon in order to minimize the total cost, including the pattern setup, inventory holding, and material consumed costs. We present two mathematical models: the Gilmore-Gomory model and the Arc flow model. In addition, two heuristics are proposed: a column generation-based heuristic (CGH) and a dynamic programming-based heuristic (IDPH). Extensive experimental studies are executed based on randomly generated instances. The computational results show that the Gilmore-Gomory model works better than the Arc flow model for the capacitated multi-period cutting stock problem with pattern setup cost. Moreover, the two heuristics are comparable, as both can obtain high quality solutions. Statistical analyses are also performed to verify these conclusions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文专注于电容多时期切割股票问题。在生产过程中,多个相同的输入杆可以捆绑在一起并同时切割。我们说这些输入杆用相同的图案切割。 Vanderbeck(2000)一旦发现从一个图案转换到另一个图案涉及显着的设置时间(以调整刀姿势)和成本(例如,与试验中的废物相关的成本);因此,模式设置成本不能忽略。在本文中,我们考虑了具有模式设置成本的电容多周期切割股票问题。在这方面,我们的目标是在规划地平线上确定每个决定期间的这种模式的模式和发生,以便最小化总成本,包括模式设置,库存保持和所消耗的成本。我们提出了两个数学模型:Gilmore-Gomory模型和电弧流模型。此外,提出了两个启发式机:基于列的启发式(CGH)和基于动态编程的启发式(IDPH)。基于随机生成的实例执行广泛的实验研究。计算结果表明,Gilmore-Gomory模型的功率优于电容多周期切割股票问题的弧形流模型,采用模式设置成本。此外,这两个启发式是可比的,因为都可以获得高质量的解决方案。还执行统计分析以验证这些结论。 (c)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Computers & operations research》 |2019年第9期|218-229|共12页
  • 作者

    Ma Ning; Liu Ya; Zhou Zhili;

  • 作者单位

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ Sch Management Xian 710049 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ Sch Management Xian 710049 Shaanxi Peoples R China|Xi An Jiao Tong Univ State Key Lab Mfg Syst Engn Xian 710054 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

    Xi An Jiao Tong Univ Sch Management Xian 710049 Shaanxi Peoples R China|Xi An Jiao Tong Univ State Key Lab Mfg Syst Engn Xian 710054 Shaanxi Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Multiperiod; Cutting stock; Pattern setup; Mathematical models; Heuristics;

    机译:多极;切割股;模式设置;数学模型;启发式;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号