...
【24h】

Curling's paradox

机译:冰壶悖论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

There is an age old debate in curling about whether it is better to be down one point with last shot, or ahead by one point without. The objective of this paper is to apply sensitivity analysis as a methodology to differentiate what appears to be two seemingly equal scenarios. A probability tree is developed for each scenario and a comparison is made based on an expected value basis. Sensitivity analysis is performed to determine whether preference changes with changes in the key parameters. Indeed, preference is impacted by changes in these parameters. In general there is no universally preferred scenario; under specific conditions a general preference can be established. Ultimately, preference for one scenario over the other is based on an individual's perception of the probability of scoring with last shot.
机译:在curl缩问题上存在着一个古老的争论,那就是在最后一枪之前下降一点还是在没有镜头时领先一点是更好。本文的目的是将敏感性分析作为一种方法来区分似乎是两个看似相等的情况。为每种情况开发一个概率树,并根据期望值进行比较。进行敏感性分析以确定偏好是否随关键参数的改变而改变。实际上,偏好会受到这些参数变化的影响。总的来说,没有通用的方案。在特定条件下,可以建立一般的偏好。最终,一个场景比另一个场景的偏好是基于个人对最后一枪得分可能性的认识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号