首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Deindividuation effects on normative and informational social influence within computer-mediated-communication
【24h】

Deindividuation effects on normative and informational social influence within computer-mediated-communication

机译:去个性化对计算机媒介传播中规范性和信息性社会影响的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Research on social influence shows that different patterns take place when this phenomenon happens within computer-mediated-communication (CMC), if compared to face-to-face interaction. Informational social influence can still easily take place also by means of CMC, however normative influence seems to be more affected by the environmental characteristics. Different authors have theorized that deindividuation nullifies the effects of normative influence, but the Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects theorizes that users will conform even when deindividuated, but only if social identity is made salient.The two typologies of social influence have never been studied in comparison, therefore in our work, we decided to create an online experiment to observe how the same variables affect them, and in particular how deindividuation works in both cases. The 181 experimental subjects that took part, performed 3 tasks: one aiming to elicit normative influence, and two semantic tasks created to test informational influence. Entropy has been used as a mathematical assessment of information availability.Our results show that normative influence becomes almost ineffective within CMC (1.4% of conformity) when subjects are deindividuated.Informational influence is generally more effective than normative influence within CMC (15-29% of conformity), but similarly to normative influence, it is inhibited by deindividuation.
机译:对社会影响力的研究表明,与面对面互动相比,当这种现象在计算机介导的通信(CMC)中发生时,会发生不同的模式。借助CMC,信息社会影响仍然很容易发生,但是规范性影响似乎更受环境特征的影响。不同的作者提出理论,去个体化使规范影响力的作用无效,但是去个体化效应的社会身份模型理论上认为,即使去个体化,用户也将服从,但前提是必须使社会身份显着。两种社会影响类型从未在本文中进行过研究。比较,因此,在我们的工作中,我们决定创建一个在线实验,以观察相同的变量如何影响它们,尤其是在两种情况下去个体化的工作方式。参加了181个实验主题,执行了3个任务:一个旨在引起规范性影响,另一个创建了语义性任务以测试信息性影响。熵已被用作信息可用性的数学评估。我们的结果表明,当个体被个体化时,规范化影响在CMC内几乎无效(1.4%合格)。信息影响通常比CMC内的规范性影响更有效(15-29%一致性),但与规范性影响类似,它会受到去个体化的抑制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号