首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Internet testing: Equivalence between proctored lab and unproctored field conditions
【24h】

Internet testing: Equivalence between proctored lab and unproctored field conditions

机译:互联网测试:托管实验室和非托管现场条件之间的等效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Companies that use web-based testing do not need to invite applicants to their offices for screening purposes, and applicants are not required to travel. Given the world-wide accessibility of the Internet and the savings in travel costs, web-based testing expands the applicant pool to geographically distant regions. This advantage comes along with the tangible drawback of less control over the testing situation and therefore possible influence on the data quality of scores obtained via Internet testing. This study examined the equivalence of proctored and unproctored web-based psychological testing. Results from 163 potential applicants who participated in a combined laboratory-field and between-subject/within-subject design study with two experimental conditions and two control conditions did not provide evidence that testing conditions affected test results.
机译:使用基于Web的测试的公司无需邀请申请人到其办公室进行筛选,并且不需要申请人出差。鉴于Internet在世界范围内的可访问性以及节省的差旅费用,基于Web的测试将申请人群扩展到了地理上相距遥远的地区。这种优势伴随着明显的缺点,即对测试情况的​​控制较少,因此可能会对通过Internet测试获得的分数的数据质量产生影响。这项研究检查了基于网络的有监督和无监督的心理测试的等效性。来自163个潜在申请人的结果参加了结合两个实验条件和两个对照条件的实验室范围和受试者间/受试者间设计研究,但没有提供证据表明测试条件会影响测试结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号