...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Offline time is quality time. Comparing within-group self-disclosure in mobile messaging applications and face-to-face interactions
【24h】

Offline time is quality time. Comparing within-group self-disclosure in mobile messaging applications and face-to-face interactions

机译:离线时间是优质时间。比较移动消息传递应用程序中的组内自披露和面对面的交互

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In contrast to the prominent individualistic view on self-disclosure, this study focuses on self-disclosure in groups of prior acquaintances that both meet offline and communicate online. It compares within-group self-disclosure between offline face-to-face (FtF) interactions and online communication via mobile messaging applications (MMAs). An online-survey (N = 357) was conducted to test for differences between within-group self-disclosure online and offline across four dimensions (amount, depth, breadth, valence). The results show that there is more amount, more breadth and more depth for offline within-group self-disclosure, but it is less positively valenced than online within-group self-disclosure. Interestingly, the mere frequency of communication is higher in an MMA environment. In spite of the permanent availability of the online communication sphere, group members do not permanently disclose personal information to each other online. Thus, for within-group self-disclosure, offline time seems quality time. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:与关于自我披露的突出个人主义观点相反,本研究集中于既有线下见面又在线交流的熟人群体中的自我披露。它比较了脱机面对面(FtF)交互和通过移动消息应用程序(MMA)进行的在线通信之间的组内自公开。进行了一次在线调查(N = 357),以测试在四个维度(金额,深度,广度,化合价)上在线和离线组内自我披露之间的差异。结果表明,线下群体内部自我披露的数量,广度和深度都比在线群体内部自我披露的积极性低。有趣的是,在MMA环境中,通信的频率更高。尽管在线交流领域具有永久可用性,但小组成员并不会在网上彼此永久公开个人信息。因此,对于组内自公开,脱机时间似乎是质量时间。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号