首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Not so fast: A reply to Benedetto et al. (2015)
【24h】

Not so fast: A reply to Benedetto et al. (2015)

机译:不太快:回复Benedetto等。 (2015年)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Benedetto et al. (2015) compared regular reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation for comprehension, visual fatigue, performance, mental workload, and ocular behavior. We further investigated the relation between RSVP and comprehension in two studies involving a total of 172 participants. We used two presentation speed conditions: one that was close to regular reading (as in the target article) and a faster one. Results of the two studies reported here clearly and consistently shown a loss in comprehension when speed presentation increased over the normal reading speed. Mental workload was also assessed (using both subjective and behavioral Measures) and results indicated that the effect on comprehension was not due to the attention devoted to the reading task, but most probably to difficulties in encoding. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:Benedetto等。 (2015年)比较了常规阅读和快速连续视觉呈现在理解,视觉疲劳,表现,精神负荷和眼部行为方面的表现。我们在两项涉及172名参与者的研究中进一步研究了RSVP与理解力之间的关系。我们使用了两种表示速度条件:一种接近常规阅读条件(如目标文章中所述)和一种更快的条件。此处报道的两项研究的结果清晰一致地表明,当速度呈现速度超过正常阅读速度时,理解力就会下降。还评估了心理工作量(使用主观和行为两种方法),结果表明对理解的影响不是由于专注于阅读任务,而是最有可能是编码困难。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号