...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Exploring the role of justification and cognitive effort exertion on post-purchase regret in online shopping
【24h】

Exploring the role of justification and cognitive effort exertion on post-purchase regret in online shopping

机译:探索正当性和认知努力对网上购物后购买后悔的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Decision justification provides assurance and reduces negative post-decision emotions, while simultaneously expends decision costs (i.e., cognitive effort). The current paper investigated the function of justification and cognitive effort related to regret, specifically in the online shopping context in two studies. In Study 1, 112 participants reviewed vignettes in a 2 x 2 within-subjects design involving cognitive effort (high versus low) and justification of action (easy versus difficulty), and reported the regret level when their purchase decision yielded subpar consequences. As expected, high cognitive effort and easy justification reduced regret. However, the effect of justification on regret was moderated by cognitive effort. In Study 2,178 participants were randomly assigned to conditions in a 2 x 2 between subjects design involving cognitive effort (high versus low) and decision justification (waste versus control). Participants followed a cover story and shopped for a laptop online; then they rated the regret level had they made an unplanned purchase. Results confirmed the hypothesis; regret was greater when justification was wasted. However, wasted justification only worsened regret when more cognitive effort was exerted. The current studies shed light on understanding an intricate dynamic between information processing and justification in relation to regret when shopping online. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:决策辩护提供了保证并减少了决策后的负面情绪,同时花费了决策成本(即认知努力)。当前的论文调查了与后悔有关的辩护和认知努力的功能,特别是在两项研究中的在线购物环境中。在研究1中,有112位参与者在2 x 2的主题设计中对渐晕进行了回顾,涉及认知努力(高与低)和行动合理性(容易与困难),并报告了当他们的购买决定产生低于标准的后果时的遗憾程度。不出所料,高的认知努力和简单的辩解减少了后悔。但是,正当性对后悔的影响通过认知努力得以缓和。在研究中,有2178名参与者被随机分配到受试者设计中2 x 2的条件,受试者设计涉及认知力(高与低)和决策依据(浪费与对照)。参与者跟随一个封面故事,在线购买了笔记本电脑。然后,如果他们进行了计划外的购买,他们对后悔程度进行了评分。结果证实了这一假设;当浪费理由时,遗憾更大。但是,浪费的辩护只会在施加更多的认知努力时才使后悔更加恶化。当前的研究揭示了理解信息处理和辩护之间的复杂动态以及与在线购物时的后悔有关的动态。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号