首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >Scales for measuring user engagement with social network sites: A systematic review of psychometric properties
【24h】

Scales for measuring user engagement with social network sites: A systematic review of psychometric properties

机译:衡量用户与社交网站互动度的量表:对心理测量特性的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past decade, various scales have been developed for measuring engagement with social network sites (SNS), but validity concerns have recently been raised about some of them. The present study thus provides a systematic review of the psychometric properties of these scales. This review included articles that aimed at either developing an SNS engagement scale or providing a systematic test of the psychometric properties of the scale. We conducted keyword-based searches of several broad multidisciplinary databases, along with reference list searches and article citation searches. These search strategies yielded a total of 14 reports, revealing validation evidence for 12 SNS engagement scales among 13,861 participants from 11 countries. There was mixed evidence for the various types of validity tests, with some scales having been validated more rigorously with multiple studies and samples while others having not yet been systematically validated. Sampling and acquiescence biases were also present for some scales. The present review provides recommendations for researchers intending to study SNS engagement. Although the literature search was multi-faceted, it may conceivably have missed studies that provided less rigorous validity evidence. Overall, this study contributes to evaluating and strengthening the methodological foundations of SNS research. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
机译:在过去的十年中,已经开发出各种量表来衡量与社交网站(SNS)的互动程度,但是最近有人对其中的有效性提出了关注。因此,本研究提供了对这些量表的心理测量特性的系统评价。这篇评论包括旨在开发SNS参与量表或对量表的心理计量学特性进行系统测试的文章。我们对几个广泛的多学科数据库进行了基于关键字的搜索,还包括了参考列表搜索和文章引用搜索。这些搜索策略总共产生了14份报告,揭示了来自11个国家的13861名参与者中12种SNS参与量表的验证证据。对于各种类型的有效性测试,存在混合的证据,其中一些量表已通过多个研究和样本进行了更严格的验证,而其他量表尚未得到系统地验证。在某些规模上也存在抽样和默认偏差。本综述为打算研究SNS参与的研究人员提供了建议。尽管文献检索是多方面的,但可以想象,它缺少提供严格性证据不足的研究。总体而言,这项研究有助于评估和加强SNS研究的方法论基础。 (C)2018作者。由Elsevier Ltd.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号