...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers & Chemical Engineering >Construction of analytical solutions and numerical methods comparison of the ideal continuous settling model
【24h】

Construction of analytical solutions and numerical methods comparison of the ideal continuous settling model

机译:理想连续沉降模型的解析解和数值方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Continuous sediment has a wide application in chemical engineering process, such as wastewater treatment, water reuse, mineral waste manage and processing. This paper provides analytical solutions of the ideal continuous settling model by using the method of characteristics. The analytical solutions are compared with experiment data to show that the solutions accurately predict the sediment height and concentration as a function of time and loading conditions. Additionally, three alternative methods, using finite differences are compared to the analytical solutions, and their accuracy and efficiency are evaluated. It is shown that all three methods are reliable for solving sedimentation problems but have varying efficiency. Method YRD is the most accurate but also has the greatest computation and implementation cost. Method SG is the least accurate but is the easiest to implement with lowest computation cost. Method G is a compromise between the two methods, providing acceptable accuracy and low computation cost.
机译:连续沉积物在化学工程过程中具有广泛的应用,例如废水处理,中水回用,矿物废物管理和处理。本文采用特征方法提供了理想的连续沉降模型的解析解。将分析溶液与实验数据进行比较,以表明该溶液可准确预测沉积物的高度和浓度随时间和载荷条件的变化。此外,将使用有限差分的三种替代方法与分析解决方案进行了比较,并评估了它们的准确性和效率。结果表明,这三种方法对于解决沉降问题都是可靠的,但效率却各不相同。方法YRD是最准确的,但也具有最大的计算和实现成本。方法SG的准确性最低,但最容易以最低的计算成本实现。方法G是这两种方法之间的折衷,提供了可接受的准确性和较低的计算成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号