首页> 外文期刊>Informatica >Hierarchical Decision Making Framework for Evaluation and Improvement of Composite Systems (Example for Building)
【24h】

Hierarchical Decision Making Framework for Evaluation and Improvement of Composite Systems (Example for Building)

机译:评估和改进复合系统的层次决策框架(建筑示例)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Straipsnyje aprašoma sprendimu priemimo hierarchine struktura, skirta vertinti sudetingas sis-temas ju tobulinimo/perprojektavimo metu. Struktura apjungia hierarchini, morfologini ir dau-giakriterini projektavima (HMDP), morfologine grupine problema ir atlieka dalinimo arba sintezes makroeuristika. Sistemos vertinimo procesas apjungia hierarchini ekspertiniu metodu integravima: integruo-jamu lenteliu metoda arba morfologini projektavima. Taip atliekama daugiapakope sutvarkomoji klasifikacija. Sistemos tobulinimo procesas nagrinejamas kaip perprojektavimo operaciju parinki-mas ir planavimas ivertinant operaciju (procesu) charakteristikas ir binarinius ryšius operaciju aibems. Sistemos tobulinimo proceso modeliavimui naudojamas keletas kombinatorines opti-mizacijos modeliu, iskaitant HMDP. Siulomas metodas pritaikytas sprendžiant realu dviaukščio pastato perprojektavimo uždavini, ivertinant, kad statyba numatoma padidinto seismingumo teritorijoje.%The article describes a hierarchical decision making framework for the evaluation and improvement/redesign of composite systems. The framework is based on Hierarchical Morphological Multicriteria Design (HMMD) and corresponding morphological clique problem which realize "partitioning/synthesis macroheuristic". The system evaluation process consists in hierarchical integration of expert judgment (as ordinal estimates): a method of integration tables or the above-mentioned morphological approach. As a result, ordinal multi-state classification is realized. The system improvement/redesign process is examined as the selection and planning of redesign operations while taking into account operations attributes (e.g., required resources, effectiveness) and binary relations {equivalence, complementarity, precedence) on the operation sets. For modeling the system improvement process several combinatorial optimization models are used (knapsack problem, multiple choice problem, etc.) including HMMD. The suggested approach is illustrated by realistic numerical example for two-floor building. This applied problem is examined from the viewpoint of earthquake engineering.
机译:本文介绍了在开发/重新设计过程中评估复杂系统的决策层次结构。该结构结合了层次,形态和多准则设计(HMDP),形态学组问题,并执行分区或综合宏观方法。系统评估过程结合了专家方法的层次集成:可集成表格方法或形态设计。这是一个多级排序分类。通过评估操作(过程)的特性和一组操作的二元关系,系统改进过程被认为是重新设计操作的选择和计划。几种组合优化模型(包括HMDP)用于对系统改进过程进行建模。所提出的方法用于解决两层建筑物的现实重新设计问题,评估在地震活动性增加的地区计划进行的建筑。该框架基于分层形态学多准则设计(HMMD),并对应于实现“划分/综合宏观启发式”的形态学集团问题。系统评估过程包括专家判断(作为有序估计)的分层集成:一种集成表的方法或上述形态学方法。结果,实现了有序的多状态分类。将系统改进/重新设计过程作为重新设计操作的选择和计划进行检查,同时考虑操作属性(例如,所需的资源,有效性)和操作集上的二进制关系(等效性,互补性,优先级)。为了对系统改进过程进行建模,使用了包括HMMD在内的几种组合优化模型(背包问题,多项选择问题等)。通过两层建筑的实际数值示例来说明所提出的方法。从地震工程的角度研究了这个应用问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号