首页> 外文期刊>Computer standards & interfaces >Why Jave~TM was-not-standardized twice
【24h】

Why Jave~TM was-not-standardized twice

机译:为什么Java〜TM两次未标准化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper examines two attempts by Sun Microsystems to standardize its Java~TM Technology (a proprietary de facto standard). Sun approached ISO/IEC JTC1 and later the ECMA consortium, but it withdrew both times. In this paper, I analyse Sun's actions. A conceptual framework is applied that distinguishes two levels of coordination in standardization: 'technology-oriented compatibility control' and 'orchestration of market orientation'. Sun's actions addressed both levels. It initially used standardization to focus attention on Java~TM and increase confidence in an open, stable Jana specification process. But it turned to proprietary 'compatibility control' in reaction to standard politics and developments in the market.
机译:本文研究了Sun Microsystems对其Java〜TM技术(事实上的专有标准)进行标准化的两次尝试。 Sun与ISO / IEC JTC1以及后来的ECMA联盟取得了联系,但两次都退出了。在本文中,我分析了Sun的行为。应用了一个概念框架,该框架区分了标准化中的两个协调级别:“面向技术的兼容性控制”和“面向市场的编排”。 Sun的行为涉及两个层面。它最初使用标准化来将注意力集中在Java〜TM上,并增加了对开放,稳定的Jana规范过程的信心。但是它转向专有的“兼容性控制”,以响应标准的政治和市场发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号