...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer networks >On distributed power saving mechanisms of wireless LANs 802.11e U-APSD vs 802.11 power save mode
【24h】

On distributed power saving mechanisms of wireless LANs 802.11e U-APSD vs 802.11 power save mode

机译:关于无线局域网的分布式节能机制802.11e U-APSD与802.11节能模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The integration of wireless LAN technology in mobile devices such as cellular phones, PDAs or laptops has become a user need due to its popularity in providing high speed wireless Internet access at a low cost. Such devices though should meet users' expectations with regard to QoS, i.e., guarantee a reasonable voice quality when VoIP is used, and power saving efficiency, i.e., standby and calling times should be similar to the ones of cellular phones. The IEEE 802.11e standard, which extends the 802.11 wireless LAN MAC layer with QoS and power saving enhancements, should be the most appropriate solution to address users' wishes in those devices. In this paper, we focus on the 802.11e functionality likely to be included in mobile devices in the short-term, EDCA for QoS and U-APSD for power saving, and evaluate the performance improvements and associated costs of two possible configurations of U-APSD as compared to the 802.11 power save mode. In addition, the dependency between the QoS and power saving enhancements obtained with U-APSD and the available channel capacity is analyzed considering three different scenarios: 802.11b, 802.11b+g and 802.11g. The evaluation is based on our proposed implementation of U-APSD: Static U-APSD (SU-APSD). The main conclusions that can be drawn from our results are that U-APSD significantly outperforms the 802.11 power save mode in all considered performance metrics and that the performance enhancements obtained with U-APSD are independent of the available channel capacity.
机译:由于无线局域网技术以低成本提供高速无线互联网访问的普及,已将无线局域网技术集成到诸如蜂窝电话,PDA或笔记本电脑之类的移动设备中成为用户的需求。尽管这样的设备应该满足用户对QoS的期望,即在使用VoIP时保证合理的语音质量,并且省电效率(即待机和通话时间)应与蜂窝电话相似。 IEEE 802.11e标准通过QoS和省电增强功能扩展了802.11无线LAN MAC层,应该是解决这些设备中用户期望的最合适的解决方案。在本文中,我们着眼于短期内可能包含在移动设备中的802.11e功能,用于QoS的EDCA和用于节能的U-APSD,并评估了两种可能的U-与802.11省电模式相比,APSD。此外,考虑了三种不同的情况,分析了使用U-APSD获得的QoS和节能增强与可用信道容量之间的相关性:802.11b,802.11b + g和802.11g。该评估基于我们提议的U-APSD实施方案:静态U-APSD(SU-APSD)。从我们的结果可以得出的主要结论是,在所有考虑的性能指标中,U-APSD明显优于802.11省电模式,并且U-APSD所获得的性能增强与可用信道容量无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号