首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >An analysis of traditional rules applied by Australian courts to establish personal jurisdiction and their application in e-commerce
【24h】

An analysis of traditional rules applied by Australian courts to establish personal jurisdiction and their application in e-commerce

机译:分析澳大利亚法院为确立人身管辖权而采用的传统规则及其在电子商务中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article analyses the jurisdictional principles employed by Australian courts in establishing personal jurisdiction in traditional settings and its extension to e-commerce cases. The Australian courts apply the court rules to exercise personal jurisdiction over defendants. The article discusses these rules relating to serving process within and outside Australia and jurisdiction based on the submission of the parties. The adequacies of principles like forum-non-conveniens, forum selection clauses which are vital in the personal jurisdiction inquiry are analysed. The unique High Court decision in Dow Jones v. Gutnick is discussed and the approach followed by the court critically analysed to highlight the excessive exercise of personal jurisdiction. Other cases concerning the internet are also discussed to highlight the approaches followed to establish personal jurisdiction in internet and e-commerce cases. It is argued.that the drawbacks highlight the need for legislation to regulate personal jurisdiction in e-commerce cases.
机译:本文分析了澳大利亚法院在传统环境下建立人身管辖权时所采用的管辖权原则,并将其扩展到电子商务案件。澳大利亚法院采用法院规则对被告行使个人管辖权。本文根据当事方的意见讨论了有关澳大利亚境内和境外服务程序以及管辖权的这些规则。分析了在个人管辖权查询中至关重要的诸如论坛不便,论坛选择条款之类的原则的适当性。讨论了高等法院在道琼斯诉古特尼克诉案中的独特判决,并对法院遵循的方法进行了严格分析,以强调过度行使个人管辖权。还讨论了其他有关互联网的案例,以突出介绍在互联网和电子商务案例中建立个人管辖权所遵循的方法。有争议的是,这些弊端凸显了在电子商务案件中需要立法来规范个人管辖权的立法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号