首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >The legal definition of personal data in the regulatory environment of the Russian Federation: Between formal certainty and technological development
【24h】

The legal definition of personal data in the regulatory environment of the Russian Federation: Between formal certainty and technological development

机译:俄罗斯联邦监管环境中个人数据的法律定义:在正式确定性与技术发展之间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The regulatory environment of the Russian Federation is attracting increasing interest due to its recent focus on the aspects of data protection and the Internet governance. Starting from 2006, a comprehensive regulation of the information issues in Russia began to emerge, having immediate practical effect not only on national parties, but also - due to developments in approaches to jurisdiction - to parties acting in digital environment internationally. The purpose of the research is to consider 'narrow' approach to the legal definition of personal data (as the trigger of personal data legislation) in the regulatory environment of the Russian Federation in the context of regulation of informational and telecommunication technologies with a particular focus on 'Big Data'. The problem considered implies the balance between the principle of formal certainty of legal norms, on the one hand, and technological developments, on the other. The formal definition of personal data shall be interpreted uniformly to ensure consistent and predictable application of law which appears not reliably possible at the moment, although the Russian definition of personal data corresponds to the CETS Convention No. 108 which Russia is a party to, As the analysis of the Russian court practice shows, the courts are applying the broad definition interpreting it as if it has at least two additional criteria: that a set of data should be enough to identify an individual and that only a set of data in possession of a particular operator should be considered. It is suggested that these criteria find reflection in "surgical" amendments to the legislation, and the United Kingdom's Data Protection Act, 1998 can serve as a source of adoption in terms of comparative law. Furthermore, the article discusses whether the 'narrow' approach may be viewed as contributing to privacy protection in the age of Big Data, rather than lowering barriers of privacy. The authors explain that the 'narrow' approach may be considered positive in this aspect because it allows keeping the existing general privacy regulation workable in a reasonably predictable manner. Besides, the research may serve as an introductory material into the Russian data protection legislation. (C) 2016 Vladislav Arkhipov, Victor Naumov. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:俄罗斯联邦的监管环境由于其最近对数据保护和Internet治理方面的关注而引起了越来越多的关注。从2006年开始,对俄罗斯信息问题的全面监管开始出现,不仅对国家政党产生了实际的影响,而且由于管辖权方法的发展,对国际数字环境中的政党也产生了直接的实际影响。该研究的目的是在信息和电信技术监管的背景下,考虑俄罗斯联邦监管环境中对个人数据法律定义(作为个人数据立法的触发因素)的“狭义”方法在“大数据”上。所考虑的问题意味着一方面法律规范的形式确定性原则与另一方面的技术发展之间的平衡。个人资料的正式定义应统一解释,以确保目前似乎无法可靠实现的法律的连贯和可预测的应用,尽管俄罗斯的个人资料定义与俄罗斯加入的《 CEST公约》第108号相对应。对俄罗斯法院实践的分析表明,法院正在应用广义定义,将其解释为似乎至少还有两个附加标准:一组数据应足以识别一个人,并且只有一组数据拥有应考虑特定的操作员。建议这些标准反映在立法的“外科”修正中,英国的《 1998年数据保护法》可以作为比较法采用的依据。此外,本文讨论了在大数据时代是否可以将“缩小”方法视为对隐私保护做出了贡献,而不是降低了隐私壁垒。作者解释说,“狭窄”方法在这方面可能被认为是积极的,因为它可以使现有的一般隐私法规以合理可预测的方式保持可行。此外,该研究还可以作为俄罗斯数据保护法规的入门材料。 (C)2016弗拉迪斯拉夫·阿尔希波夫,维克多·纳乌莫夫由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号