首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Autonomous weapon systems: Is a space warfare manual required?
【24h】

Autonomous weapon systems: Is a space warfare manual required?

机译:自主武器系统:是否需要太空战手册?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The legalities for the use of Autonomous Weapon Systems (AWS) in space warfare are examined. Currently, there are manuals for air and missile warfare, naval warfare and cyber warfare, a clear gap in the literature is that there is no manual for space warfare. We find that the current jurisprudence of space is somewhat considered analogous to the high seas and in the absence of a Space Warfare Manual, legal jurisdiction may consider that certain treaties are only in effect when in the territory of that State. In turn, the effectiveness of those treaties may mitigate against any obligations related to the military operations of that same State using AWS in space. Whilst it is yet to be tested in the courts, there are significant gaps identified in Lex lata and supporting Declarations, Principles and Treaties in terms of space warfare. Such gaps could act as the foundations for both law reform and the requirement for the creation of a Space Warfare Manual. (c) 2017 Patrick van Esch, Gavin Northey, Magdalene Striluk, & Helen Wilson. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:审查了在太空战中使用自主武器系统(AWS)的合法性。当前,有空中和导弹战,海战和网络战的手册,文献中明显的空白是没有太空战的手册。我们发现,目前的空间判例在某种程度上被认为类似于公海,并且在没有《空间战手册》的情况下,法律管辖权可能会认为某些条约仅在该国领土内才有效。反过来,这些条约的效力可能减轻与该国在太空中使用AWS的军事行动有关的任何义务。尽管尚待法院检验,但《 Lex lata》和支持《宣言,原则和条约》的空间战方面仍存在明显差距。这样的差距既可以作为法律改革的基础,也可以作为制定《太空战手册》的基础。 (c)2017年Patrick Van Esch,Gavin Northey,Magdalene Striluk和Helen Wilson。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号