首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Revisiting country of origin principle: Challenges related to regulating e-commerce in the European Union
【24h】

Revisiting country of origin principle: Challenges related to regulating e-commerce in the European Union

机译:重新审视原产国原则:与欧盟电子商务监管有关的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article analyses the country of origin principle of information society services in the light of harmonisation and unification efforts undertaken by the European lawgiver. Although the country of origin principle remains the key element of the construction of freedom to provide information society services, the principle itself suffers a number of both explicit and implicit restrictions which render its practical application a serious challenge. The difficulty is posed by the fact that the Electronic Commerce Directive fails to expressly specify both the scope of harmonisation as regards the principle, and the level of harmonisation of the directive itself. Furthermore, it is understood differently by private international lawyers. In the eDate Advertising case the ECJ ruled that the principle is not a conflict-of-laws rule, neither does it require implementation to the national legal systems in this shape. This is not to mean, however, that the debate over the function of the country of origin principle in private international law is over. Last but not least, there are many different types of country of origin principles applicable to various types of services provided via the Internet. This multitude of country of origin principles is perhaps the greatest weakness the regulatory approach adopted by the European lawmaker. (C) 2017 Paul Przemyslaw Polariski. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文根据欧洲法律制定者的协调和统一努力,分析了信息社会服务的起源国原则。尽管原籍国原则仍然是建设提供信息社会服务的自由的关键要素,但该原则本身受到许多明确和隐含的限制,这使其实际应用面临严峻挑战。困难在于电子商务指令未能明确规定该原则的统一范围和指令本身的统一程度。此外,国际私人律师对此的理解也有所不同。在eDate Advertising案中,欧洲法院裁定该原则不是法律冲突规则,也不需要以这种形式实施到国家法律体系中。但是,这并不意味着关于原产国原则在国际私法中的作用的辩论已经结束。最后但并非最不重要的一点是,有许多不同类型的原产国原则适用于通过Internet提供的各种类型的服务。众多原产国原则可能是欧洲立法者采用的监管方法的最大弱点。 (C)2017年Paul Przemyslaw Polariski。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号