首页> 外文期刊>Computational Optimization and Applications >Proximal-like contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities in a unified framework II: general methods and numerical experiments
【24h】

Proximal-like contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities in a unified framework II: general methods and numerical experiments

机译:统一框架下单调变分不等式的近似逼近收缩方法II:一般方法和数值实验

获取原文
       

摘要

Approximate proximal point algorithms (abbreviated as APPAs) are classical approaches for convex optimization problems and monotone variational inequalities. In Part I of this paper (He et al. in Proximal-like contraction methods for monotone variational inequalities in a unified framework I: effective quadruplet and primary methods, 2010), we proposed a unified framework consisting of an effective quadruplet and a corresponding accepting rule. Under the framework, various existing APPAs can be grouped in the same class of methods (called primary or elementary methods) which adopt one of the geminate directions in the effective quadruplet and take the unit step size. In this paper, we extend the primary methods by using the same effective quadruplet and the accepting rule. The extended (general) contraction methods need only minor extra even negligible costs in each iteration, whereas having better properties than the primary methods in sense of the distance to the solution set. A set of matrix approximation examples as well as six other groups of numerical experiments are constructed to compare the performance between the primary (elementary) and extended (general) methods. As expected, the numerical results show the efficiency of the extended (general) methods are much better than that of the primary (elementary) ones.
机译:近似近点算法(缩写为APPA)是凸优化问题和单调变分不等式的经典方法。在本文的第一部分(He等人,在统一框架I中的单调变分不等式的近似近似收缩方法:有效四联体和主要方法,2010年)中,我们提出了一个由有效四联体和相应接受组成的统一框架。规则。在该框架下,可以将各种现有的APPA分组为同一类方法(称为主要方法或基本方法),这些方法采用有效四联体中的一个重叠方向并采用单位步长。在本文中,我们通过使用相同的有效四元组和接受规则扩展了主要方法。扩展(一般)收缩方法在每次迭代中只需要很少的额外甚至微不足道的成本,而就解决方案集的距离而言,其具有比主要方法更好的性能。构造了一组矩阵逼近示例以及其他六组数值实验,以比较主要(基本)方法和扩展(一般)方法的性能。正如预期的那样,数值结果表明扩展(通用)方法的效率比主要(基本)方法的效率要好得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号